On 28.03.10 15:43, clipka wrote:
> Am 28.03.2010 10:33, schrieb Thorsten Froehlich:
>> On 28.03.10 07:25, Woody wrote:
>>> Sorry for joining the conversation late. I only saw the thread after
>>> making the
>>> post at
>>> It appears ot be of the same problem.
>> No, that code uses a linear spline for which bounding works.
> Given that the bug reported by the OP has two components - garbled
> geometry /and/ a missing bounding box - I'd rather say yes, as far as
> the garbled geometry is concerned.
The geometry problems are the result of the bounding going wrong.
Post a reply to this message