 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/12/12 08:28:
> Hm-hmmm, I see. Thanks for the advise. I even tried something similar
> (slightly different resolution). But still, after half a day I gave up. It
> is this condemned (critical) 45176 position, where everything appears to be
> come to an end.
>
> Hopefully someone can supply me with that file...
>
> Sven Littkowski
>
I'd like to provide you with a photons map, but it only stop 2 to 3 100's later
on my machine. It even stop if I only leave 1 chopper.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half shut afterwards.
Benjamin Franklin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, no problem, Alain. Anyone else?
Sven Littkowski
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote in message
news:475fece7$1@news.povray.org...
> Sven Littkowski nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/12/12 08:28:
>> Hm-hmmm, I see. Thanks for the advise. I even tried something similar
>> (slightly different resolution). But still, after half a day I gave up.
>> It is this condemned (critical) 45176 position, where everything appears
>> to be come to an end.
>>
>> Hopefully someone can supply me with that file...
>>
>> Sven Littkowski
>>
> I'd like to provide you with a photons map, but it only stop 2 to 3 100's
> later on my machine. It even stop if I only leave 1 chopper.
>
> --
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
> Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half shut afterwards.
> Benjamin Franklin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sven Littkowski" <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> Hmm, was anyone doing the file with a
> resolution of 3200 x 2400 pixels?
say again?!
It just took me 9 minutes in 512x384, no AA, no Radiosity, no Photons! and just
a single chopper!
like some guy above said, you need a render farm! Does the chopper really need
to be a mirror?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Nemesis,
in fact, to talk about the "mirror" effect of the chopper: I developed the
scene file some long time ago. It looks very different with the previous
version of POVRAY (v.3.5), as far as I remember. With version 3.6, the
entire image looks much softer, like an increased radiosity value for
everything. But in addition, the textures just don't look anymore the way
they did. The chopper was supposed to be glossy, yes, but still to show
clearly a color move from light gray (at the bottom) to dark gray (at the
top of the chopper). Now, with version 3.6, the gloss became to a mirror.
I do not want to change too much in the scene file, I prefer to wait how the
final version of POVRAY 3.7 will interpret certain attributes.
Render Farm: can anyone post a link to get more information on that subject?
I might be interested in such a "Render Farm".
Sven Littkowski
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.47602c6edee6dc9a773c9a3e0@news.povray.org...
> "Sven Littkowski" <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>> Hmm, was anyone doing the file with a
>> resolution of 3200 x 2400 pixels?
>
> say again?!
>
> It just took me 9 minutes in 512x384, no AA, no Radiosity, no Photons!
> and just
> a single chopper!
>
> like some guy above said, you need a render farm! Does the chopper really
> need
> to be a mirror?
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sven Littkowski" <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> the textures just don't look anymore the way
> they did. The chopper was supposed to be glossy, yes, but still to show
> clearly a color move from light gray (at the bottom) to dark gray (at the
> top of the chopper). Now, with version 3.6, the gloss became to a mirror.
it is a mirror because "Glossy" from finish.inc, which is an old file, uses
reflection. and not even fresnel reflection, but simply reflection and much
specularity. I don't know exactly what is there about glossy in it...
> Render Farm: can anyone post a link to get more information on that subject?
> I might be interested in such a "Render Farm".
first thing is to buy a few dozens of PCs, then link them together in your own
network...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Many PCs: Might do just that...
Thanks,
Sven Littkowski
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.4761862bdee6dc9af48316a30@news.povray.org...
> "Sven Littkowski" <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>> the textures just don't look anymore the way
>> they did. The chopper was supposed to be glossy, yes, but still to show
>> clearly a color move from light gray (at the bottom) to dark gray (at the
>> top of the chopper). Now, with version 3.6, the gloss became to a mirror.
>
> it is a mirror because "Glossy" from finish.inc, which is an old file,
> uses
> reflection. and not even fresnel reflection, but simply reflection and
> much
> specularity. I don't know exactly what is there about glossy in it...
>
>> Render Farm: can anyone post a link to get more information on that
>> subject?
>> I might be interested in such a "Render Farm".
>
> first thing is to buy a few dozens of PCs, then link them together in your
> own
> network...
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sven Littkowski" <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> I am not sure if POVRAY crashes on my scene file or not, who can help?
>
> It starts to parse the photons, but at position 45176 it suddenly stops
> doing anything. Maybe POVRAY still calculates, but I am not sure. At least,
> it reacts properly on abort request. Who would like to test my file (see
> attached ZIP) and tell me if it crashed or not?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sven Littkowski
The zip appears to be corrupt. Appears to contain a single png file,
unreadable.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
