POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : corkscrew.png Server Time
5 Nov 2024 18:21:29 EST (-0500)
  corkscrew.png (Message 1 to 10 of 10)  
From: Mike Miller
Subject: corkscrew.png
Date: 20 May 2023 17:30:00
Message: <web.64693b9daa002e2d3bb576b5dabc9342@news.povray.org>
Old classic corkscrew/bottle opener. Will show up hanging in my work bench
scene. Scene file posted.
Miller


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'corkscrew.png' (794 KB)

Preview of image 'corkscrew.png'
corkscrew.png


 

From: Alain Martel
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 07:23:12
Message: <6469ff20$1@news.povray.org>
Le 2023-05-20 à 17:29, Mike Miller a écrit :
> Old classic corkscrew/bottle opener. Will show up hanging in my work bench
> scene. Scene file posted.
> Miller

The real classic corkscrew bottle opener had no plastic insert in the 
base. 100% metal. I know, I've played with one for years as a kid.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Miller
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 08:15:00
Message: <web.646a0ae1d76401d23bb576b5dabc9342@news.povray.org>
Alain Martel <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:

> > Old classic corkscrew/bottle opener. Will show up hanging in my work bench
> > scene. Scene file posted.
> > Miller
>
> The real classic corkscrew bottle opener had no plastic insert in the
> base. 100% metal. I know, I've played with one for years as a kid.

My bad.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bald Eagle
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 10:05:00
Message: <web.646a2442d76401d21f9dae3025979125@news.povray.org>
"Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> My bad.

Your Honor, the above named Defendant has just provided the Court with a clear
and unambiguous admission of guilt.

As this is the first offense, POV State is willing to suspend the traditional
clock cycle time spent on hard-coding macros as provided for in the
documentation.

Let the fine be set at 250 POV units.

- B. E. Esq.


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain Martel
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 10:40:20
Message: <646a2d54$1@news.povray.org>
Le 2023-05-21 à 10:01, Bald Eagle a écrit :
> "Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> 
>> My bad.
> 
> Your Honor, the above named Defendant has just provided the Court with a clear
> and unambiguous admission of guilt.
> 
> As this is the first offense, POV State is willing to suspend the traditional
> clock cycle time spent on hard-coding macros as provided for in the
> documentation.
> 
> Let the fine be set at 250 POV units.
> 
> - B. E. Esq.
> 
😃😂🤣🤣🤣


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Miller
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 12:35:00
Message: <web.646a47fad76401d23bb576b5dabc9342@news.povray.org>
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
> > My bad.
>
> Your Honor, the above named Defendant has just provided the Court with a clear
> and unambiguous admission of guilt.
>
> As this is the first offense, POV State is willing to suspend the traditional
> clock cycle time spent on hard-coding macros as provided for in the
> documentation.
>
> Let the fine be set at 250 POV units.
>
> - B. E. Esq.

You're too kind...I'm sure that wasn't my first offense....maybe today. :)
In my defense, I did manage to post a scene file that parsed without errors. Who
knew?
Mike.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bald Eagle
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 21 May 2023 14:05:00
Message: <web.646a5d46d76401d21f9dae3025979125@news.povray.org>
"Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> You're too kind...I'm sure that wasn't my first offense....maybe today. :)

In Re Case File PR-NG-2023-5-21-01, Miller, Mike:

Ah.  A repeat offender.  Habitual offender, even.

> In my defense, I did manage to post a scene file that parsed without errors. Who
> knew?

In consideration of the facts amended to the case file as stated above, good
behaviour, and community service, the fine is waived.

Upon removal of the offending plastic piece which initiated these proceedings,
conviction will be eligible for expungement.

Prosecution rests.

- B. E. Esq.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Miller
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 22 May 2023 12:25:00
Message: <web.646b96d3d76401d23bb576b5dabc9342@news.povray.org>
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
> > You're too kind...I'm sure that wasn't my first offense....maybe today. :)
>
> In Re Case File PR-NG-2023-5-21-01, Miller, Mike:
>
> Ah.  A repeat offender.  Habitual offender, even.
>
> > In my defense, I did manage to post a scene file that parsed without errors. Who
> > knew?
>
> In consideration of the facts amended to the case file as stated above, good
> behaviour, and community service, the fine is waived.
>
> Upon removal of the offending plastic piece which initiated these proceedings,
> conviction will be eligible for expungement.
>
> Prosecution rests.
>
> - B. E. Esq.

haha... habitual offender for sure.
....and I'll try to refrain from the liberal use of 'classic' to describe the
junk I've collected in the last 65 years - accept for my wife - she is a
classic. :)

....all in good fun. Mike.


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 23 May 2023 14:00:00
Message: <web.646cfe32d76401d29b4924336e066e29@news.povray.org>
"Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Old classic corkscrew/bottle opener.

Beautifully made and rendered! Kudos.

> Let the fine be set at 250 POV units.

I object, Your Honor! Case law from 1837 clearly states that the fine should be
no more than 10 POV units, "in perpetuity". My learned opponent is quite
mistaken on that point. Economic inflation should have no bearing on the case.

K.W Esq., for the defense


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: corkscrew.png
Date: 24 May 2023 02:35:40
Message: <646db03c$1@news.povray.org>
Op 23/05/2023 om 19:56 schreef Kenneth:
> "Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> Old classic corkscrew/bottle opener.
> 
> Beautifully made and rendered! Kudos.
> 
>> Let the fine be set at 250 POV units.
> 
> I object, Your Honor! Case law from 1837 clearly states that the fine should be
> no more than 10 POV units, "in perpetuity". My learned opponent is quite
> mistaken on that point. Economic inflation should have no bearing on the case.
> 
> K.W Esq., for the defense
> 

Hear! Hear!   (from the gallery)

Order! Order!   (from the judge)

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.