POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : new tree Server Time
25 Apr 2024 23:33:03 EDT (-0400)
  new tree (Message 11 to 20 of 24)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>
From: jr
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 18 Jan 2019 15:10:01
Message: <web.5c4231632a45eaa248892b50@news.povray.org>
hi,

"And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > [*] without 3d goggle + data-glove interface I'd struggle anyway.  :-)
>
> If you want to learn I can teach you. ...

wow, thank you very much for the offer.  while I won't tire of seeing images of
rendered "real world organisms" posted here, I have rarely felt wanting to
create such scenes.  I'm more interested in creating abstract space(s).

wrt to the previous tree - I now think the "atmosphere" is very Haruki Murakami.
 :-)


> ... It can "populate" objects in a 2d array. ... adjust the distribution ...
> I feel this is a good function, but I cannot tried many tree type because I use
> the free version.

the result bears out the feeling.  :-)  are there no open source tools doing a
similar job?


regards, jr.


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 01:30:00
Message: <web.5c42c3482a45eaa21876a5c0@news.povray.org>
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> hi,
>
> "And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> > "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > > [*] without 3d goggle + data-glove interface I'd struggle anyway.  :-)
> >
> > If you want to learn I can teach you. ...
>
> wow, thank you very much for the offer.  while I won't tire of seeing images of
> rendered "real world organisms" posted here, I have rarely felt wanting to
> create such scenes.  I'm more interested in creating abstract space(s).
>
> wrt to the previous tree - I now think the "atmosphere" is very Haruki Murakami.
>  :-)
>

Maybe I can take a look at his novel.

>
> > ... It can "populate" objects in a 2d array. ... adjust the distribution ...
> > I feel this is a good function, but I cannot tried many tree type because I use
> > the free version.
>
> the result bears out the feeling.  :-)  are there no open source tools doing a
> similar job?
>
>
> regards, jr.

I don't know. I'm familiar with pov ray.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 02:48:53
Message: <5c42d665$1@news.povray.org>
On 18-1-2019 15:27, And wrote:
> //#declare trunk_13=
> #declare PR_DIFFUSE=pigment {color rgb <0.056,0.058,0.036> transmit 0/100 }
> 
> 
> #declare F1=finish{
>                     diffuse  1
>                     oren_nayar 1.117
>                     }
> 
[snip]

oren_nayar? I suppose that is a macro you wrote yourself based on this 
reflectance model? It does not seem to be mentioned in the POV-Ray docs...

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 06:05:00
Message: <web.5c4303502a45eaa21876a5c0@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 18-1-2019 15:27, And wrote:
> > //#declare trunk_13=
> > #declare PR_DIFFUSE=pigment {color rgb <0.056,0.058,0.036> transmit 0/100 }
> >
> >
> > #declare F1=finish{
> >                     diffuse  1
> >                     oren_nayar 1.117
> >                     }
> >
> [snip]
>
> oren_nayar? I suppose that is a macro you wrote yourself based on this
> reflectance model? It does not seem to be mentioned in the POV-Ray docs...
>
> --
> Thomas

new feature of 3.7.?  The newest uberpov has this feature, too.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 07:12:12
Message: <5c43141c$1@news.povray.org>
On 19-1-2019 12:00, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 18-1-2019 15:27, And wrote:
>>> //#declare trunk_13=
>>> #declare PR_DIFFUSE=pigment {color rgb <0.056,0.058,0.036> transmit 0/100 }
>>>
>>>
>>> #declare F1=finish{
>>>                      diffuse  1
>>>                      oren_nayar 1.117
>>>                      }
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> oren_nayar? I suppose that is a macro you wrote yourself based on this
>> reflectance model? It does not seem to be mentioned in the POV-Ray docs...
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
> 
> new feature of 3.7.?  The newest uberpov has this feature, too.
> 

Not in 3.7, nor in 3.8 alpha. So, must be UberPOV.

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Bald Eagle
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 08:25:00
Message: <web.5c4324f42a45eaa2765e06870@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:

> Not in 3.7, nor in 3.8 alpha. So, must be UberPOV.
>
> --
> Thomas

No, a while back I recall clipka experimenting with using different reflection
models

Mostly since I spent some time trying to understand what went into it.
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.57cb6721f854a3db5e7df57c0@news.povray.org%3E/

So, it is/was actual POV-Ray:

http://news.povray.org/povray.beta-test/thread/%3C57040752@news.povray.org%3E/


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 12:15:00
Message: <web.5c435ad62a45eaa2cd98345b0@news.povray.org>
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> > Not in 3.7, nor in 3.8 alpha. So, must be UberPOV.
> >
>
> ...it is/was actual POV-Ray:
>
> http://news.povray.org/povray.beta-test/thread/%3C57040752@news.povray.org%3E/

I just read (or re-read?) that older post; fascinating.

So I tried using the oren_nayer feature in one of the recent 3.8 alphas, but
it's not recognized. I guess it never made it into 3.8's development? Pity that;
the feature sounds quite interesting.


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 12:30:00
Message: <web.5c435e142a45eaa2cd98345b0@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

>
> So I tried using the oren_nayer feature in one of the recent 3.8 alphas...

I meant oren_nayar


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 19 Jan 2019 18:56:16
Message: <5c43b920$1@news.povray.org>
Am 19.01.2019 um 18:13 schrieb Kenneth:

> So I tried using the oren_nayer feature in one of the recent 3.8 alphas, but
> it's not recognized. I guess it never made it into 3.8's development? Pity that;
> the feature sounds quite interesting.

The problem was that the `albedo` mode of operation is poorly defined 
for oren-nayar and the other one (I think it was minnaert, would have to 
look it up), and I haven't made up my mind yet how to solve this.


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: new tree
Date: 20 Jan 2019 00:45:01
Message: <web.5c440a6f2a45eaa2f82eb7cf0@news.povray.org>
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 19.01.2019 um 18:13 schrieb Kenneth:
>
> > So I tried using the oren_nayer feature in one of the recent 3.8 alphas, but
> > it's not recognized. I guess it never made it into 3.8's development? Pity that;
> > the feature sounds quite interesting.
>
> The problem was that the `albedo` mode of operation is poorly defined
> for oren-nayar and the other one (I think it was minnaert, would have to
> look it up), and I haven't made up my mind yet how to solve this.


?! I think the problem for oren nayar model is solved in previous:
http://news.povray.org/povray.beta-test/thread/%3C57040752@news.povray.org%3E/

with the total reflection light counted.
And the appearance of the rendered image with oren-nayar surface convinces me...


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 4 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.