POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : tree in 2017 Server Time
28 Mar 2024 18:17:20 EDT (-0400)
  tree in 2017 (Message 7 to 16 of 16)  
<<< Previous 6 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 15 Jan 2019 01:30:00
Message: <web.5c3d7d75ac928fcf5634fe930@news.povray.org>
ingo <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> in news:web.5c3c3244cf23c140191f56c90@news.povray.org And wrote:
>
> > Night and not sun
>
> Very nice. It somehow has a silk screen print quality to it. The sphere is
> intruiging,
>
> ingo

The sphere is very easy to create in fact. I forget the detail but it should be
a reddish emission media.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 15 Jan 2019 02:30:50
Message: <5c3d8c2a$1@news.povray.org>
On 15-1-2019 7:21, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 14-1-2019 7:55, And wrote:
>>> Night and not sun
>>>
>>
>> Nice!
>>
>> [Beware! that lower branch is going to break off ;-)]
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
> 
> Generally speaking it doesn't.

No, but this is a typical problem with POVtree.

> 
> I'm looking for a better(commercial) tree generator.
> 

Have you tried Arbaro? http://arbaro.sourceforge.net/

However, one of the best commercial ones is Xfrog I think. 
http://xfrog.com/category/XF.html

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 15 Jan 2019 07:35:00
Message: <web.5c3dd308ac928fcf5634fe930@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 15-1-2019 7:21, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> On 14-1-2019 7:55, And wrote:
> >>> Night and not sun
> >>>
> >>
> >> Nice!
> >>
> >> [Beware! that lower branch is going to break off ;-)]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> > Generally speaking it doesn't.
>
> No, but this is a typical problem with POVtree.
>

> >
> > I'm looking for a better(commercial) tree generator.
> >
>
> Have you tried Arbaro? http://arbaro.sourceforge.net/
>

I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.

And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
at end-part.



> However, one of the best commercial ones is Xfrog I think.
> http://xfrog.com/category/XF.html
>
> --
> Thomas

But I'm attracted by this:
https://www.thegrove3d.com/releases/the-grove-release-6/

Looks amazing


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 02:51:06
Message: <5c3ee26a$1@news.povray.org>
On 15-1-2019 13:33, And wrote:
> I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.
> 
> And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
> bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
> at end-part.
> 

Ah. I am not using Arbaro too often, so that is good to know.

> 
> 
> But I'm attracted by this:
> https://www.thegrove3d.com/releases/the-grove-release-6/
> 
> Looks amazing
> 

Indeed. I did not know that one. It also is reasonably priced. Only 
problem (for me) is that it seems to be Blender-based. That last one is 
still on my learning wish-list...

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 02:55:01
Message: <web.5c3ee219ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
"And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > On 15-1-2019 7:21, And wrote:
> > > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > >> On 14-1-2019 7:55, And wrote:
> > >>> Night and not sun
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> [Beware! that lower branch is going to break off ;-)]
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Thomas
> > >
> > > Generally speaking it doesn't.
> >
> > No, but this is a typical problem with POVtree.
> >
>
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a better(commercial) tree generator.
> > >
> >
> > Have you tried Arbaro? http://arbaro.sourceforge.net/
> >
>
> I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.
>
> And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
> bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
> at end-part.
>
>

I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.


Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
side is my modify version.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'tree compare1.png' (803 KB)

Preview of image 'tree compare1.png'
tree compare1.png


 

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:08:23
Message: <5c3ee677$1@news.povray.org>
On 16-1-2019 8:49, And wrote:
> I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
> simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
> release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.
> 
You need to be member of the SourceForge to contact the author (W. Diestel).

> 
> Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
> side is my modify version.
> 

Looks good indeed.

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:15:01
Message: <web.5c3ee7e0ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 15-1-2019 13:33, And wrote:
> > I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.
> >
> > And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
> > bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
> > at end-part.
> >
>
> Ah. I am not using Arbaro too often, so that is good to know.
>
> >
> >
> > But I'm attracted by this:
> > https://www.thegrove3d.com/releases/the-grove-release-6/
> >
> > Looks amazing
> >
>
> Indeed. I did not know that one. It also is reasonably priced. Only
> problem (for me) is that it seems to be Blender-based. That last one is
> still on my learning wish-list...
>
> --
> Thomas

I learn it superficial, too. Only focus on the part which I want to use.


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:25:01
Message: <web.5c3ee9e1ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 16-1-2019 8:49, And wrote:
> > I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
> > simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
> > release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.
> >
> You need to be member of the SourceForge to contact the author (W. Diestel).
>
> >
> > Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
> > side is my modify version.
> >
>
> Looks good indeed.
>
> --
> Thomas

But not totally... I have sculpted the trunk on the right one.


Post a reply to this message

From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 04:28:04
Message: <5c3ef924$1@news.povray.org>
And wrote on 15/01/2019 07:23:
> Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> And wrote on 14/01/2019 07:55:
>>> Night and not sun
>>>
>>
>> Ooh. Unsure of the green, but I like the composition a lot.
>> Paolo
> 
> Religious meaning...?
> 
No, seeing the image I was thinking to a red moon folding the tree, in a 
deep blue sky.
;-)
Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 05:40:00
Message: <web.5c3f0999ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> And wrote on 15/01/2019 07:23:
> > Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >> And wrote on 14/01/2019 07:55:
> >>> Night and not sun
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ooh. Unsure of the green, but I like the composition a lot.
> >> Paolo
> >
> > Religious meaning...?
> >
> No, seeing the image I was thinking to a red moon folding the tree, in a
> deep blue sky.
> ;-)
> Paolo

Our seeing is so different.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 6 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.