POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : tree in 2017 Server Time
25 Apr 2024 10:57:26 EDT (-0400)
  tree in 2017 (Message 11 to 16 of 16)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 02:55:01
Message: <web.5c3ee219ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
"And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > On 15-1-2019 7:21, And wrote:
> > > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > >> On 14-1-2019 7:55, And wrote:
> > >>> Night and not sun
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Nice!
> > >>
> > >> [Beware! that lower branch is going to break off ;-)]
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Thomas
> > >
> > > Generally speaking it doesn't.
> >
> > No, but this is a typical problem with POVtree.
> >
>
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a better(commercial) tree generator.
> > >
> >
> > Have you tried Arbaro? http://arbaro.sourceforge.net/
> >
>
> I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.
>
> And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
> bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
> at end-part.
>
>

I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.


Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
side is my modify version.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'tree compare1.png' (803 KB)

Preview of image 'tree compare1.png'
tree compare1.png


 

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:08:23
Message: <5c3ee677$1@news.povray.org>
On 16-1-2019 8:49, And wrote:
> I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
> simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
> release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.
> 
You need to be member of the SourceForge to contact the author (W. Diestel).

> 
> Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
> side is my modify version.
> 

Looks good indeed.

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:15:01
Message: <web.5c3ee7e0ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 15-1-2019 13:33, And wrote:
> > I used arbaro in fact. It sometimes has this problem, too.
> >
> > And there is another problem about it. Its stems distributes on the
> > bigger(parent) stem is even distribution, but generally stems grows much dense
> > at end-part.
> >
>
> Ah. I am not using Arbaro too often, so that is good to know.
>
> >
> >
> > But I'm attracted by this:
> > https://www.thegrove3d.com/releases/the-grove-release-6/
> >
> > Looks amazing
> >
>
> Indeed. I did not know that one. It also is reasonably priced. Only
> problem (for me) is that it seems to be Blender-based. That last one is
> still on my learning wish-list...
>
> --
> Thomas

I learn it superficial, too. Only focus on the part which I want to use.


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 03:25:01
Message: <web.5c3ee9e1ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 16-1-2019 8:49, And wrote:
> > I change its code in private to execute simulation more like a tree. It is quite
> > simple. But I'm unable to change the corresponding GUI about it(so I didn't
> > release it). And I don't know how to contact the author.
> >
> You need to be member of the SourceForge to contact the author (W. Diestel).
>
> >
> > Attachment is the compare. Tree at left is the original version, tree at right
> > side is my modify version.
> >
>
> Looks good indeed.
>
> --
> Thomas

But not totally... I have sculpted the trunk on the right one.


Post a reply to this message

From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 04:28:04
Message: <5c3ef924$1@news.povray.org>
And wrote on 15/01/2019 07:23:
> Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> And wrote on 14/01/2019 07:55:
>>> Night and not sun
>>>
>>
>> Ooh. Unsure of the green, but I like the composition a lot.
>> Paolo
> 
> Religious meaning...?
> 
No, seeing the image I was thinking to a red moon folding the tree, in a 
deep blue sky.
;-)
Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: And
Subject: Re: tree in 2017
Date: 16 Jan 2019 05:40:00
Message: <web.5c3f0999ac928fcf6c89d9810@news.povray.org>
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> And wrote on 15/01/2019 07:23:
> > Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >> And wrote on 14/01/2019 07:55:
> >>> Night and not sun
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ooh. Unsure of the green, but I like the composition a lot.
> >> Paolo
> >
> > Religious meaning...?
> >
> No, seeing the image I was thinking to a red moon folding the tree, in a
> deep blue sky.
> ;-)
> Paolo

Our seeing is so different.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.