Am 27.08.2018 um 15:33 schrieb clipka:

> @Ive: Well, I'll be! - This is an image that IC (1.0.12) fails to
> display properly.

Scratch that. The PNG uses alpha, with the colour channel set to pitch
black, while also carrying a bKGD chunk recommending black background.
Black on black - of course IC /correctly/ shows this as just a uniform
black slab if "use alpha" and "use background" are enabled.

I should have known better than to doubt IC ;)

Post a reply to this message

> In jpg it's better....;-))))
> 
> Albun

no it isn't

This is one of those case where png is the preferred file type :)


If I understand your question correctly, you're asking if anyone else 
ever created pixel-art with POV-Ray, by using pixel-sized objects, 
right? If so: yes, I have, a long time ago, before I learned about 
processing.org.
I used POV-Ray because I knew the language and wanted to do some 
procedural pixel-art. But Processing is very easy to learn and much more 
suited for procedural pixel-art.

cu!
-- 
ZK

Post a reply to this message

Le 18-08-27 à 09:20, Albun a écrit :
> "Albun" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> Well, i think that you can see image now
>>
>> If yes, it's incredible to explain, so rewind to 1st message.
>> My english is a google traduction....
>>
>> Albun
> 
> In jpg it's better....;-))))
> 
> Albun
> 

46K as JPG, and 11.2K as PNG. PNG win by a factor of 4.5.

Post a reply to this message

On 8/27/2018 8:12 AM, Albun wrote:
> Well, i think that you can see image now
> 
> If yes, it's incredible to explain, so rewind to 1st message.
> My english is a google traduction....
> 
> Albun
> 
> 
> 

What am I looking at?


Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> What am I looking at?

Looks like an Autostereogram to me...

Squint.   :D

Post a reply to this message

On 28-8-2018 2:14, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> 
>> What am I looking at?
> 
> Looks like an Autostereogram to me...
> 
> Squint.   :D
> 

Hurts. My old eyes can't any more. :-|

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Bonjour,




ce sujet sur le forum.



Albun

Post a reply to this message

On 8/28/2018 2:35 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 28-8-2018 2:14, Bald Eagle wrote:
>> Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>
>>> What am I looking at?
>>
>> Looks like an Autostereogram to me...
>>

>>
> 
> Hurts. My old eyes can't any more. :-|
> 

I was never able to do it in my life.


Mike

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 27.08.2018 um 14:12 schrieb Albun:
> > Well, i think that you can see image now
>
> @Ive: Well, I'll be! - This is an image that IC (1.0.12) fails to
> display properly.
>
>
> @Album: What are we seeing there? Is this an animation of a sprite with
> about 400 (20x20) frames in one single PNG image?
>
> > If yes, it's incredible to explain, so rewind to 1st message.
> > My english is a google traduction....
>
> You still didn't tell us your native language. "traduction" hints at a
> romanic language, maybe French?
>
> I'm sure we have enough French-speaking people around here that it would
> be worth trying to ask your question again in French.

Hello/Hi
French is my birth language. If you ever need help... :D. There is an
international section in this forum in case of need anyway. I don't post often
but come from time to time on this forum.

Post a reply to this message

On 08/29/2018 12:32 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
> On 8/28/2018 2:35 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 28-8-2018 2:14, Bald Eagle wrote:
>>> Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What am I looking at?
>>>
>>> Looks like an Autostereogram to me...
>>>

>>>
>>
>> Hurts. My old eyes can't any more. :-|
>>
> 
> I was never able to do it in my life.

Me neither.


-- 
dik
Rendered 1024 of 921600 pixels (0%)

Post a reply to this message