 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kontemplator" <haf### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> "And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> > "Fractracer" <lg.### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > > > On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
> > > > > An artworks in 2013.
> > > > >
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Photographs or renders? If you look carefully at the first of the four,
> > > > you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
> > > > you think?
> > > >
> > > > [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
> > > > especially number 4... hmm]
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thomas
> > >
> > > I had seen, but I do not know where and when, a series of photos recreating 3d
> > > scenes...
> >
> > Does you mean someone takes photos to imitate 3d scenes?
>
> Yes, there was a thread last year in these group.
>
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.off-topic/thread/%3C585ae71a%241%40news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=418020&toff=50&mtop=413531
>
Someone has much time.
>
> Anyway, I'm not sure if that "metal ball" is a retraced scene. The resolution of
> common 3.1 MPix CCD Sensor format called SUXGA.
Did you mean my renders? I might upload a 2560x1920 picture.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kontemplator" <haf### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>
> Yes, there was a thread last year in these group.
>
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.off-topic/thread/%3C585ae71a%241%40news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=418020&toff=50&mtop=413531
>
Thank you for the link. I was not very sure of my memory.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Fractracer" <lg.### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> > > I had seen, but I do not know where and when, a series of photos recreating 3d
> > > scenes...
> >
> > Does you mean someone takes photos to imitate 3d scenes?
>
> Yes, real scenes made with objects to mimic 3D rendering. It seems to me that I
> saw it in the newsgroup, but maybe I'm wrong.
It doesn't matter.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 24.11.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Kontemplator:
> Anyway, I'm not sure if that "metal ball" is a retraced scene. The resolution of
> common 3.1 MPix CCD Sensor format called SUXGA.
According to flickr, the original resolution is actually 2560x1920. The
2048x1536 is just an alternative downscaled download format offered by
flickr.
If the 2560x1920 PNG download were a fake, it would be a surprisingly
good one, including POV-Ray-typical PNG header features.
We can even learn that the file was rendered on 2016-01-07 around 10:24
UTC using an unofficial 64-bit build of POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8141620 for
Windows, compiled with MS Visual Studio 2010.
The 2048x1536 JPEG version, on the other hand, shows clear signs of NOT
having being created with POV-Ray, but rather having been generated from
the 2560x1920 PNG original.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 24.11.2017 um 16:32 schrieb clipka:
> We can even learn that the file was rendered on 2016-01-07 around 10:24
> UTC using an unofficial 64-bit build of POV-Ray 3.7.1-alpha.8141620 for
> Windows, compiled with MS Visual Studio 2010.
... oh, and "File_Gamma" was either set to "sRGB" or left to the default.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24-11-2017 13:51, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
>>> An artworks in 2013.
>>>
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
>>>
>>
>> Photographs or renders?
> These four are renders.
>
And more than gorgeous ones indeed!
>
>
>> If you look carefully at the first of the four,
>> you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
>> you think?
>
> I think that should not be important. It can be a chip on the star.
Yes, but... a chip would be less regular and not be exactly parallel to
the bowl surface :-)
>
>>
>> [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
>> especially number 4... hmm]
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> I have posted some of those pictures at this newsgroup in the past.
>
Aaaah...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 24-11-2017 13:51, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
> >>> An artworks in 2013.
> >>>
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
> >>>
> >>
> >> Photographs or renders?
> > These four are renders.
> >
>
> And more than gorgeous ones indeed!
I want to make sure what did you mean if it is my art are gorgeous.
> >
> >
> >> If you look carefully at the first of the four,
> >> you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
> >> you think?
> >
> > I think that should not be important. It can be a chip on the star.
>
> Yes, but... a chip would be less regular and not be exactly parallel to
> the bowl surface :-)
Ha
> >
> >>
> >> [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
> >> especially number 4... hmm]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> > I have posted some of those pictures at this newsgroup in the past.
> >
>
> Aaaah...
>
> --
> Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-11-2017 11:19, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 24-11-2017 13:51, And wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
>>>>> An artworks in 2013.
>>>>>
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Photographs or renders?
>>> These four are renders.
>>>
>>
>> And more than gorgeous ones indeed!
>
> I want to make sure what did you mean if it is my art are gorgeous.
Simply that those four images are superior in their composition and
lighting.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you look carefully at the first of the four,
>>>> you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
>>>> you think?
>>>
>>> I think that should not be important. It can be a chip on the star.
>>
>> Yes, but... a chip would be less regular and not be exactly parallel to
>> the bowl surface :-)
>
> Ha
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
>>>> especially number 4... hmm]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> I have posted some of those pictures at this newsgroup in the past.
>>>
>>
>> Aaaah...
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
>
>
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 26-11-2017 11:19, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> On 24-11-2017 13:51, And wrote:
> >>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >>>> On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
> >>>>> An artworks in 2013.
> >>>>>
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Photographs or renders?
> >>> These four are renders.
> >>>
> >>
> >> And more than gorgeous ones indeed!
> >
> > I want to make sure what did you mean if it is my art are gorgeous.
>
> Simply that those four images are superior in their composition and
> lighting.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> If you look carefully at the first of the four,
> >>>> you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
> >>>> you think?
> >>>
> >>> I think that should not be important. It can be a chip on the star.
> >>
> >> Yes, but... a chip would be less regular and not be exactly parallel to
> >> the bowl surface :-)
> >
> > Ha
> >
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
> >>>> especially number 4... hmm]
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>> I have posted some of those pictures at this newsgroup in the past.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Aaaah...
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thomas
Haw
Thank you
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> "Fractracer" <lg.### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > > On 23-11-2017 14:33, And wrote:
> > > > An artworks in 2013.
> > > >
https://www.flickr.com/photos/131379210@N05/24148267101/in/album-72157660551392542/
> > > >
> > >
> > > Photographs or renders? If you look carefully at the first of the four,
> > > you can see the star intersecting the bowl at one point... So? What do
> > > you think?
> > >
> > > [somehow, I have the nagging feeling to have seen these before;
> > > especially number 4... hmm]
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thomas
> >
> > I had seen, but I do not know where and when, a series of photos recreating 3d
> > scenes...
>
> Does you mean someone takes photos to imitate 3d scenes?
During the IRTC we had one or the other entry to win the competition with a
photograph. But IIRC they all are recognized and disqualified.
Best Regards
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
