"John Greenwood" <joh### [at] john-greenwoodcouk> wrote:
> This shape was meshed with different settings for resolution. The values are
> shown under each example.
> isoSmooth was set to no. The failures seem to happen regardless but this gives
> an indication that in the first example, with resolution = 5, the failure is due
> to the curvature being too tight.
> Also flat is about 2.5 times faster.
> The meshing time is approximately proportional to the fourth power of the
Here is an image with resolution set to 7 showing that the meshing defects are
Post a reply to this message
Download 'head7c.png' (124 KB)
Preview of image 'head7c.png'