 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/5/2016 3:47 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 05.12.2016 um 16:23 schrieb And:
>> new render..
>
> Where's the dryad gone? ;)
>
Where have all the dryads gone, long time passing?
Where have all the dryads gone, long time ago?
Sorry.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Making me miss summer already. Good variation of branches and leaves.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Better. There are two trees close to each other in the middle which seem
to entangle their branches.
You spoke about "modified Arbaro" in your original post. Are you working
on an update?
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> On 12/5/2016 3:47 PM, clipka wrote:
> > Am 05.12.2016 um 16:23 schrieb And:
> >> new render..
> >
> > Where's the dryad gone? ;)
> >
>
> Where have all the dryads gone, long time passing?
> Where have all the dryads gone, long time ago?
>
>
> Sorry.
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Nice song...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"omniverse" <omn### [at] charternet> wrote:
> Making me miss summer already. Good variation of branches and leaves.
Well.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Better. There are two trees close to each other in the middle which seem
> to entangle their branches.
>
Is it inconsistent .?
> You spoke about "modified Arbaro" in your original post. Are you working
> on an update?
>
> --
> Thomas
Never release...
I just change some code for variation.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/6/2016 1:30 PM, And wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 12/5/2016 3:47 PM, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 05.12.2016 um 16:23 schrieb And:
>>>> new render..
>>>
>>> Where's the dryad gone? ;)
>>>
>>
>> Where have all the dryads gone, long time passing?
>> Where have all the dryads gone, long time ago?
>>
>>
>> Sorry.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
>
> Nice song...
>
It came out just after Pan died. IIRC ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6-12-2016 14:55, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> Better. There are two trees close to each other in the middle which seem
>> to entangle their branches.
>>
>
> Is it inconsistent .?
I think the two trees are too close to each other. Especially the one at
the back is hardly visible. I would move it a bit backwards and to the
right.
Otherwise, you seem to have solved the branch attachments issue. Higher
resolution?
>
>> You spoke about "modified Arbaro" in your original post. Are you working
>> on an update?
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> Never release...
> I just change some code for variation.
OK.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 6-12-2016 14:55, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> Better. There are two trees close to each other in the middle which seem
> >> to entangle their branches.
> >>
> >
> > Is it inconsistent .?
>
> I think the two trees are too close to each other. Especially the one at
> the back is hardly visible. I would move it a bit backwards and to the
> right.
>
Tropical forest is my reference:
http://www.tinasdynamichomeschoolplus.com/wp-content/uploads/strata.jpg
I have another solution that making the understory layer thin.
> Otherwise, you seem to have solved the branch attachments issue. Higher
> resolution?
>
No, I just rotate an angle...ha!
> >
> >> You spoke about "modified Arbaro" in your original post. Are you working
> >> on an update?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> > Never release...
> > I just change some code for variation.
>
> OK.
>
> --
> Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-12-2016 5:41, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 6-12-2016 14:55, And wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> Better. There are two trees close to each other in the middle which seem
>>>> to entangle their branches.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it inconsistent .?
>>
>> I think the two trees are too close to each other. Especially the one at
>> the back is hardly visible. I would move it a bit backwards and to the
>> right.
>>
>
> Tropical forest is my reference:
> http://www.tinasdynamichomeschoolplus.com/wp-content/uploads/strata.jpg
>
> I have another solution that making the understory layer thin.
>
Fair enough and an excellent starting point indeed. I was only worried
about possible strange entanglement situations.
>
>
>> Otherwise, you seem to have solved the branch attachments issue. Higher
>> resolution?
>>
>
> No, I just rotate an angle...ha!
Oh! That is very good.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
