 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> Ooh! 1960's psychedelia.
>
> Magic! +1
> Regards
> Stephen
Yeah - do you know the times - not as a child as I did?
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > I have to excuse the misuse of your fine code regarding the brick finish...
>
> If that's misuse, then you're happily invited to misuse it more ;)
>
> > Is there a reason behind the misspelling of the LEGO writing?
>
> I must confess that honestly I have no idea what you're talking about.
first point - perhaps I'll do it.
second point - sorry, I've to admit to not be able to find the correct source,
where the writing was LGEO - and not by chance! So I thougt, it would be a legal
thing or so...
Anyway - most probably it wasn't caused by you...
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Ooooohh!
>
> [sings] Puff, the Magic Dragon...
>
> Thomas
Oh, PPM - haven't heard them for thirty years...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/20/2015 2:41 PM, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>> Ooh! 1960's psychedelia.
>>
>> Magic! +1
>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> Yeah - do you know the times - not as a child as I did?
>
Yeah man! It was coming of age for me. ;-)
Long hair and the wacky backy. Would not have missed it, what I can
remember of it. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 20.11.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Norbert Kern:
>
>>> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
>>> I have to excuse the misuse of your fine code regarding the brick finish...
>>
>> If that's misuse, then you're happily invited to misuse it more ;)
>>
>>> Is there a reason behind the misspelling of the LEGO writing?
>>
>> I must confess that honestly I have no idea what you're talking about.
>
> first point - perhaps I'll do it.
> second point - sorry, I've to admit to not be able to find the correct source,
> where the writing was LGEO - and not by chance! So I thougt, it would be a legal
> thing or so...
In the realm of POV-Ray LEGO renders, LGEO is indeed a well-known name,
being a library of high-quality brick shapes in POV-Ray format (as
opposed to shapes automatically generated from LDraw format); the name
is certainly designed to be an anagram of the brand name, but it can
also be read as shorthand for "Lego GEOmetry".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-11-2015 15:57, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> Ooooohh!
>>
>> [sings] Puff, the Magic Dragon...
>>
>> Thomas
>
> Oh, PPM - haven't heard them for thirty years...
>
>
>
:-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote on 19/11/2015 22.49:
> Hi Povers,
>
> for long time I wanted to use the Illusion code of Rune...
>
> Here is my trial, based on my Materials project
>
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.564e3a88b10641b17add5fa60%40news.povray.org%3E/).
>
> It's based on using an image to build a scene out of the most easy
>
> Anyway, look at the image...
>
> Norbert Kern
>
Gorgeous!
:-o
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> Hi Povers,
>
> for long time I wanted to use the Illusion code of Rune...
>
> Here is my trial, based on my Materials project
>
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.564e3a88b10641b17add5fa60%40news.povray.org%3E/).
>
> It's based on using an image to build a scene out of the most easy
>
> Anyway, look at the image...
>
> Norbert Kern
Hi Norbert,
This is a great idea and looks really good, your experiments are always
fascinating. I hope to see more scenes converted to lego.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I really love this image, nicely done !
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lightbeam" <st.### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I really love this image, nicely done !
thank's very much, Lightbeam!
When we'll see more fascinating work from you?
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
