 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Related to discussion in advanced users section.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'brickpattern.png.dat' (376 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> Related to discussion in advanced users section.
Here's the brick pattern with the brick normal commented out:
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'brickpattern2.png.dat' (372 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment instead of an
inline image...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'brickpattern3.png.dat' (376 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment instead of an
> inline image...
This site apparently appends .dat to files it doesn't recognize I think (or
maybe file extensions it doesn't recognize). I put a few binaries in the
binaries section and the .bz2 files I uploaded all have .dat appended, but the
..gz files and .tgz files don't.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: Brick, material, texture, pigment, color....
Date: 30 Aug 2014 11:40:48
Message: <5401f080$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/08/2014 16:49, jhu wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment instead of an
>> inline image...
>
> This site apparently appends .dat to files it doesn't recognize I think (or
> maybe file extensions it doesn't recognize). I put a few binaries in the
> binaries section and the .bz2 files I uploaded all have .dat appended, but the
> ..gz files and .tgz files don't.
>
Seems both of you are using the web-interface. Be aware that you can
also get a native view of the newsgroups with a newsreader.
--
IQ of crossposters with FU: 100 / (number of groups)
IQ of crossposters without FU: 100 / (1 + number of groups)
IQ of multiposters: 100 / ( (number of groups) * (number of groups))
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment instead of an
> inline image...
>
No .DAT here.
Using Thunderbird.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Brick, material, texture, pigment, color....
Date: 1 Sep 2014 03:10:20
Message: <54041bdc$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31-8-2014 20:10, Alain wrote:
>> I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment
>> instead of an
>> inline image...
>>
> No .DAT here.
> Using Thunderbird.
For some reason, .dat is added to the image when the post is addressed
on the POV-Ray site, but not when addressed from Thunderbird. And only
for these images by Bald Eagle. Strange.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 01.09.2014 09:10, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 31-8-2014 20:10, Alain wrote:
>>> I'm not sure why these are getting converted to a .dat attachment
>>> instead of an
>>> inline image...
>>>
>> No .DAT here.
>> Using Thunderbird.
>
> For some reason, .dat is added to the image when the post is addressed
> on the POV-Ray site, but not when addressed from Thunderbird. And only
> for these images by Bald Eagle. Strange.
It /might/ be because - surprise! - they're not PNG files at all; they
have a .png extension, but really they're BMP files.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/09/14 11:59, clipka wrote:
>
> It /might/ be because - surprise! - they're not PNG files at all; they
> have a .png extension, but really they're BMP files.
>
Indeed they are:
john@aphrodite:~> file Bri### [at] ternpng
BrickPattern.png: PC bitmap, Windows 3.x format, 640 x 200 x 24
;-)
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/09/14 12:08, Doctor John wrote:
> On 01/09/14 11:59, clipka wrote:
>>
>> It /might/ be because - surprise! - they're not PNG files at all; they
>> have a .png extension, but really they're BMP files.
>>
>
> Indeed they are:
>
> john@aphrodite:~> file Bri### [at] ternpng
> BrickPattern.png: PC bitmap, Windows 3.x format, 640 x 200 x 24
>
> ;-)
>
> John
>
Actually, I'm kicking myself for not noticing immediately. The size is a
big giveaway: 375 KB versus 65.1 KB.
A true PNG is attached to demonstrate the diffence.
BTW Bald Eagle, you need to change your ini file settings to generate
true PNG images
John
--
Protect the Earth
It was not given to you by your parents
You hold it in trust for your children
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'brickpattern(mod).png' (66 KB)
Preview of image 'brickpattern(mod).png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
