 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the raytracer and the blackjack.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'bender.png' (210 KB)
Preview of image 'bender.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the raytracer and the blackjack.
BTW, this took 8 days to render! Sure I piled on focal blur, radiosity, blurred
reflections, and area light, but that's still 7 days too long.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the raytracer and the blackjack.
Haha, nice. I like it :)
> BTW, this took 8 days to render! Sure I piled on focal blur, radiosity, blurred
> reflections, and area light, but that's still 7 days too long.
I'd say!
There /is/ a way to speed things up considerably, while possibly improving the
final quality. It involves rendering many frames using low-quality settings, and
averaging them all together afterward. Focal blur and antialiasing are given by
manipulating the camera's location and look_at settings. The biggest problem
using this approach is encountered when your scene takes a long time to parse.
Persistent variables would help immensely with that.
Maybe I'll upload an example soon, to show everyone how it all works. I'd be
happy if it resulted in a new patch :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-2-2014 19:36, Samuel Benge wrote:
> There /is/ a way to speed things up considerably, while possibly improving the
> final quality. It involves rendering many frames using low-quality settings, and
> averaging them all together afterward. Focal blur and antialiasing are given by
> manipulating the camera's location and look_at settings. The biggest problem
> using this approach is encountered when your scene takes a long time to parse.
> Persistent variables would help immensely with that.
Now, /that/ is an idea!
>
> Maybe I'll upload an example soon, to show everyone how it all works. I'd be
> happy if it resulted in a new patch :)
Please?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the raytracer and the blackjack.
Just in case people forgot, this is Bender from Futurama. Next up, Leela,
eventually.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 17.02.2014 19:36, schrieb Samuel Benge:
> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>>> with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget the raytracer and the blackjack.
>
> Haha, nice. I like it :)
>
>> BTW, this took 8 days to render! Sure I piled on focal blur, radiosity, blurred
>> reflections, and area light, but that's still 7 days too long.
>
> I'd say!
>
> There /is/ a way to speed things up considerably, while possibly improving the
> final quality. It involves rendering many frames using low-quality settings, and
> averaging them all together afterward. Focal blur and antialiasing are given by
> manipulating the camera's location and look_at settings. The biggest problem
> using this approach is encountered when your scene takes a long time to parse.
> Persistent variables would help immensely with that.
>
> Maybe I'll upload an example soon, to show everyone how it all works. I'd be
> happy if it resulted in a new patch :)
You mean something like UberPOV? ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
