 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi all..
New here, just found POV, and it's awesome!
I am creating some software where you design in 3D and wanted to give users an
option to view their work using ray-tracing, so I created something that would
export their work to a POV file.
It's still in early stages (i just started this last night), but it's so awesome
how well it all works.
This is just using polygon{} elements. It is a popup-card of a church.
I am pretty new to this, so hopefully people can help me answer some questions
when the time comes.
Thanks for this awesome software, it's great!
-andy.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'pcs_matrix_fix.png' (389 KB)
Preview of image 'pcs_matrix_fix.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
no no no, you're doing it all wrong.. your first image here shouldn't be
this interesting and good, it should be a reflective sphere over a badly
lit checkered plane! ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> no no no, you're doing it all wrong.. your first image here shouldn't be
> this interesting and good, it should be a reflective sphere over a badly
> lit checkered plane! ;)
OLD running gag...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
/last night/ you say???
I needed a couple of years to reach that degree of perfection in my
scenes :-)
VERY well done for a first.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain <kua### [at] videotron ca> wrote:
> > no no no, you're doing it all wrong.. your first image here shouldn't be
> > this interesting and good, it should be a reflective sphere over a badly
> > lit checkered plane! ;)
>
> OLD running gag...
And welcome to you.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Andy" <son### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Hi all..
>
> New here, just found POV, and it's awesome!
>
> I am creating some software where you design in 3D and wanted to give users an
> option to view their work using ray-tracing, so I created something that would
> export their work to a POV file.
>
> It's still in early stages (i just started this last night), but it's so awesome
> how well it all works.
>
> This is just using polygon{} elements. It is a popup-card of a church.
>
> I am pretty new to this, so hopefully people can help me answer some questions
> when the time comes.
>
> Thanks for this awesome software, it's great!
> -andy.
Probably, you in vain will waste time.
Blender can already create the POV-file.
Blender has very-very much tools for editing meshes, curves, blobs.
But, here interest to it is absent.
Possibly, a hobby of participants - file creation manually, using a GUI in
Windows, and notebook in Linux.
I created two subjects about Blender - activity is equal 0
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-9-2013 18:08, LanuHum wrote:
> But, here interest to it is absent.
I think you are wrong :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 27-9-2013 18:08, LanuHum wrote:
> > But, here interest to it is absent.
>
> I think you are wrong :-)
>
> Thomas
I draw conclusions (My opinion proceeds)(I come to an assessment):
1 . There are no questions
2 . There are no offers (wishes)
3 . There are no estimates
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-9-2013 11:33, LanuHum wrote:
>
> I draw conclusions (My opinion proceeds)(I come to an assessment):
> 1 . There are no questions
> 2 . There are no offers (wishes)
> 3 . There are no estimates
Depends on how many - real - Blender users there are here. They are not
so many I believe, but people may still be interested in the developments.
Personally, I am marginally interested as I am not a Blender user (yet)
and I can do all I want to do with Silo2Pro without Blender's steep
learning curve. Admittedly, the GUI has been improved and made more
comprehensive but still.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/09/2013 10:33 AM, LanuHum wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 27-9-2013 18:08, LanuHum wrote:
>>> But, here interest to it is absent.
>>
>> I think you are wrong :-)
>>
>> Thomas
>
> I draw conclusions (My opinion proceeds)(I come to an assessment):
> 1 . There are no questions
> 2 . There are no offers (wishes)
> 3 . There are no estimates
>
>
>
Thomas is right, you are wrong. I for one am interested.
Unfortunately I am very busy just now but would love to have an addon
that integrates Blender and PovRay.
Be patient, please.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
