 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I finally found time to render an old scene I had given up on due to the long
render times. Even with 3.7 and 4 cores it took a couple of days to render. I
think I went a bit o.t.t. on the focal blur though.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mossstone.png' (1184 KB)
Preview of image 'mossstone.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 12.05.2013 17:54, schrieb s.day:
> I finally found time to render an old scene I had given up on due to the long
> render times. Even with 3.7 and 4 cores it took a couple of days to render. I
> think I went a bit o.t.t. on the focal blur though.
Holy Moly! The render time definitely was worth it.
As for the focal blur, I think it's perfect for the size.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/12/2013 11:54 AM, s.day wrote:
> I finally found time to render an old scene I had given up on due to the long
> render times. Even with 3.7 and 4 cores it took a couple of days to render. I
> think I went a bit o.t.t. on the focal blur though.
>
> Sean
>
Now that's photo-realistic!!!! ... focal blur looks fine to me as well.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:54:50 +0200, s.day <s.d### [at] uel acuk> wrote:
> I finally found time to render an old scene I had given up on due to the
> long
> render times. Even with 3.7 and 4 cores it took a couple of days to
> render. I
> think I went a bit o.t.t. on the focal blur though.
>
> Sean
My first response was "AWESOME ROLEX!"
;)
Wow!
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
>
> Holy Moly! The render time definitely was worth it.
>
Yes, no wonder I gave up before, I reworked the rock texture on this one
as well which I think made it slower (several layers and a couple of
nested texture_maps). Also bumped up the focal blur quality settings a
bit, this is the main thing that slows it down, the image with low
quality focal blur or just AA only takes a couple of hours to trace.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
James Holsenback wrote:
>
> Now that's photo-realistic!!!! ... focal blur looks fine to me as well.
Thanks, I often use focal blur to hide things I don't like in an image
;-) but in this case it was just as it was meant to look like a macro shot.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar Xenos wrote:
>>
>
> My first response was "AWESOME ROLEX!"
> ;)
>
> Wow!
>
> --
> -Nekar Xenos-
Thanks
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The moss and rocks are gorgeous. I too think the focal blur is just right.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of the best photo-realistic images I have ever seen. Well worth the
render time.
Moss: blobs?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> One of the best photo-realistic images I have ever seen. Well worth the
> render time.
>
> Moss: blobs?
>
> Thomas
Hi Thomas,
The moss itself is a mesh object but there are also blobs underneath the
moss. I place blobs using trace onto the surface of the rock then use
trace again to place the moss plant onto the blobs. The blobs can be
used to add a less even look if the surface is flat (not really an issue
in this case).
It is pretty much the same moss macro that is used in my old train scene
just with a different mesh object for the moss and an added parameter to
determine how many of the seed pods are place.
I will probably combine the two macros together so you can choose from 1
of 3 types of moss with or without seed pods. Happy to uploade it if
anyone wants to use it, there is nothing particularly clever in there
just trace and some parameters to adjust scale/size/randomness etc.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
