 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A colour anaglyph viewable with red/cyan 3d glasses.
Comments welcome;
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'double_doors.png' (263 KB)
Preview of image 'double_doors.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nice as usual, although I think this one would be more interesting
as an anaglyph with one door open and something more distant visible
through it too.
Also I like to view 3d images full screen so I don't have
a distracting 2d border around it, but with low resolution
images the pixels get noticable. BTW, when calculating the
red/cyan offset, is there some underlying assumption how
large the metric offset on viewed screen actually is?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> nice as usual,
Thank you
> although I think this one would be more interesting
> as an anaglyph with one door open and something more distant visible
> through it too.
Yes, I agree, but I'm working my way though some more objects(door hardware) for
my manikin to stand beside ;-)
>
> Also I like to view 3d images full screen so I don't have
> a distracting 2d border around it, but with low resolution
> images the pixels get noticable.
I test render most of my scenes at 1200 smallest side, on a second computer, so
I know what you mean. I'm trying to post enough to be interesting, but not
enough to be annoying ;-)
> BTW, when calculating the
> red/cyan offset, is there some underlying assumption how
> large the metric offset on viewed screen actually is?
I use an interactive program to adjust the offset, I look for visualy pleasing.
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> nice as usual, although I think this one would be more interesting
> as an anaglyph with one door open and something more distant visible
> through it too.
....
Do you mean like this? :-)
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'double_doors_oops.png' (649 KB)
Preview of image 'double_doors_oops.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Anaglyph (red/cyan), Double doors
Date: 5 May 2012 15:49:13
Message: <4fa58439@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
StephenS wrote:
> Do you mean like this? :-)
yes, very good, exactly like this ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
StephenS wrote:
> I use an interactive program to adjust the offset, I look for visualy pleasing.
yes, I just wondered how different screen sizes / resolution
or viewing the image enlarged will affect depth perception.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 05.05.2012 21:51, schrieb Christian Froeschlin:
> StephenS wrote:
>
>> I use an interactive program to adjust the offset, I look for visualy
>> pleasing.
>
> yes, I just wondered how different screen sizes / resolution
> or viewing the image enlarged will affect depth perception.
Ideally you should view the image at whatever physical size it was
originally created for; i.e. if your display has a higher dot pitch
(total resolution divided by screen size) than StephenS', you'd ideally
enlarge the image accordingly.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
