"Samuel Benge" <stb### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Hi,>> I thought I'd try some non-polyhedral reflection groups for kaleidoscopic IFS> fractals... this is the result :)
awesome.
This *is* what polygon-based modellers can`t touch.
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> This *is* what polygon-based modellers can`t touch.
Agreed, the POV-SDL is a beautiful thing; and really beautiful work Sam!
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: A Friday Abstract
Date: 19 Nov 2011 02:55:14
Message: <4ec760e2$1@news.povray.org>
On 18-11-2011 20:45, Samuel Benge wrote:
> and another one...
This one is really astounding.
Just imagining a hovering airship leisurely floating by...
Thomas
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: A Friday Abstract
Date: 19 Nov 2011 02:57:11
Message: <4ec76157$1@news.povray.org>
On 18-11-2011 20:18, Samuel Benge wrote:
> Hi,>> I thought I'd try some non-polyhedral reflection groups for kaleidoscopic IFS> fractals... this is the result :)>> -Sam
Like always, a fantastic and detailed scape by Sam Benge! VEry, very
nice indeed.
Thomas
From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: A Friday Abstract
Date: 21 Nov 2011 06:07:12
Message: <4eca30e0$1@news.povray.org>
>Samuel Benge on date 18/11/2011 20:18 wrote:> Hi,>> I thought I'd try some non-polyhedral reflection groups for kaleidoscopic IFS> fractals... this is the result :)>> -Sam
A very interesting one!
;-)
Paolo
com> wrote: