I had been thinking about my recent experiments with crevice grime and decide to
see how it does with outside edges.

This is my first thought at it:  I simply used a larger angle (>90deg) and
inversed my control depth function.   With this method you absolutely need a
surface offset for it to work.

Refence:
Image Height:200
Control depth: 1.0
Control angle: 100
Surface offset: 0.1

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'coinc2.jpg' (69 KB)

Preview of image 'coinc2.jpg'

"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I had been thinking about my recent experiments with crevice grime and decide to
> see how it does with outside edges.
>
> This is my first thought at it:  I simply used a larger angle (>90deg) and
> inversed my control depth function.   With this method you absolutely need a
> surface offset for it to work.
>
> Refence:
> Image Height:200
> Control depth: 1.0
> Control angle: 100
> Surface offset: 0.1
>
> -tgq

A test with both and edge wear and crevice grime layer.  Not the best quality
run, but a good general idea.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'test2.jpg' (80 KB)

Preview of image 'test2.jpg'

"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht 
news:web.4d877262a847941281c811d20@news.povray.org...
> A test with both and edge wear and crevice grime layer.  Not the best 
> quality
> run, but a good general idea.

To me, this looks very good. It seems to be working fine.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message