POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Red Baubles Server Time
2 Nov 2024 18:49:13 EDT (-0400)
  Red Baubles (Message 1 to 7 of 7)  
From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Red Baubles
Date: 25 Feb 2010 21:55:01
Message: <web.4b873787a408cd7b719c5ee30@news.povray.org>
Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
creative.  Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
within the frame.  I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay.  (Variance
1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'baubles.png' (138 KB)

Preview of image 'baubles.png'
baubles.png


 

From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 26 Feb 2010 03:06:58
Message: <4b878122@news.povray.org>
>Aaron Gillies  on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> creative.  Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> within the frame.  I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay.  (Variance
> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
>
Nice but too blurred imho
;-)
Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 26 Feb 2010 09:00:01
Message: <web.4b87d32a132a9b66719c5ee30@news.povray.org>
I think you are right about the blurriness ...  Funny, it looked okay to me last
night!  I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.

Aaron

Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >Aaron Gillies  on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> > Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> > creative.  Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> > within the frame.  I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> > granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay.  (Variance
> > 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
> >
> Nice but too blurred imho
> ;-)
> Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 26 Feb 2010 12:01:18
Message: <4b87fe5e@news.povray.org>

> I think you are right about the blurriness ...  Funny, it looked okay to me last
> night!  I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
> a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.
>
> Aaron
>
> Paolo Gibellini<p.g### [at] gmailcom>  wrote:
>>> Aaron Gillies  on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
>>> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
>>> creative.  Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
>>> within the frame.  I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
>>> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay.  (Variance
>>> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
>>>
>> Nice but too blurred imho
>> ;-)
>> Paolo
>
>
>

Try reducing the aperture down to 2 or 1. With a smaller aperture, 
you'll also need less samples.


Post a reply to this message

From: Aaron Gillies
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 26 Feb 2010 14:30:01
Message: <web.4b88204e132a9b66719c5ee30@news.povray.org>
Second version with reduced aperture.  A little less fuzzy.

Alain <aze### [at] qwertyorg> wrote:

> > I think you are right about the blurriness ...  Funny, it looked okay to me last
> > night!  I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
> > a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > Paolo Gibellini<p.g### [at] gmailcom>  wrote:
> >>> Aaron Gillies  on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> >>> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> >>> creative.  Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> >>> within the frame.  I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> >>> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay.  (Variance
> >>> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
> >>>
> >> Nice but too blurred imho
> >> ;-)
> >> Paolo
> >
> >
> >
>
> Try reducing the aperture down to 2 or 1. With a smaller aperture,
> you'll also need less samples.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (142 KB)

Preview of image 'test.png'
test.png


 

From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 1 Mar 2010 05:05:15
Message: <4b8b915b$1@news.povray.org>
>Aaron Gillies  on date 26/02/2010 20:26 wrote:
> Second version with reduced aperture.  A little less fuzzy.
>
This is a better shot imho,
Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: UncleHoot
Subject: Re: Red Baubles
Date: 1 Mar 2010 23:12:37
Message: <4b8c9035$1@news.povray.org>
"Paolo Gibellini" <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message 
news:4b8b915b$1@news.povray.org...
> This is a better shot imho,
> Paolo

I concur.

Very nice!


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.