|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
creative. Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
within the frame. I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay. (Variance
1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'baubles.png' (138 KB)
Preview of image 'baubles.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Aaron Gillies on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> creative. Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> within the frame. I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay. (Variance
> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
>
Nice but too blurred imho
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think you are right about the blurriness ... Funny, it looked okay to me last
night! I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.
Aaron
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >Aaron Gillies on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> > Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> > creative. Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> > within the frame. I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> > granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay. (Variance
> > 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
> >
> Nice but too blurred imho
> ;-)
> Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I think you are right about the blurriness ... Funny, it looked okay to me last
> night! I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
> a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.
>
> Aaron
>
> Paolo Gibellini<p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>> Aaron Gillies on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
>>> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
>>> creative. Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
>>> within the frame. I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
>>> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay. (Variance
>>> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
>>>
>> Nice but too blurred imho
>> ;-)
>> Paolo
>
>
>
Try reducing the aperture down to 2 or 1. With a smaller aperture,
you'll also need less samples.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Second version with reduced aperture. A little less fuzzy.
Alain <aze### [at] qwertyorg> wrote:
> > I think you are right about the blurriness ... Funny, it looked okay to me last
> > night! I used an aperture setting of 8 and then pulled the focal point forward
> > a bit to soften things up, but I think it's too soft now.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > Paolo Gibellini<p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >>> Aaron Gillies on date 26/02/2010 03:53 wrote:
> >>> Thought I would give myself a couple of hours this evening to do something
> >>> creative. Very simple scene, thinking about colors and how to arrange things
> >>> within the frame. I used blur_samples of 9600 and still got a lot of
> >>> granulation deeper into the field, but I suppose that is okay. (Variance
> >>> 1/10000 and confidence .99 as well.)
> >>>
> >> Nice but too blurred imho
> >> ;-)
> >> Paolo
> >
> >
> >
>
> Try reducing the aperture down to 2 or 1. With a smaller aperture,
> you'll also need less samples.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test.png' (142 KB)
Preview of image 'test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Aaron Gillies on date 26/02/2010 20:26 wrote:
> Second version with reduced aperture. A little less fuzzy.
>
This is a better shot imho,
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Paolo Gibellini" <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:4b8b915b$1@news.povray.org...
> This is a better shot imho,
> Paolo
I concur.
Very nice!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |