 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Vector or real?
(or mix?)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 't3.png' (495 KB)
Preview of image 't3.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
EagleSun wrote:
> Vector or real?
Don't you mean "rendered or real"?
With these types of questions I have noticed that the principle "if it
looks real, say rendered, and if it looks rendered, say real" works
quite well, so I will say: Rendered.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:10:30 +0200, Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
>EagleSun wrote:
>> Vector or real?
>
> Don't you mean "rendered or real"?
>
> With these types of questions I have noticed that the principle "if it
>looks real, say rendered, and if it looks rendered, say real" works
>quite well, so I will say: Rendered.
I can't fault your logic so it's rendered.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3937o31bnnohnbr19cnrpspmk7959tnuki@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:10:30 +0200, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>
>>EagleSun wrote:
>>> Vector or real?
>>
>> Don't you mean "rendered or real"?
>>
>> With these types of questions I have noticed that the principle "if it
>>looks real, say rendered, and if it looks rendered, say real" works
>>quite well, so I will say: Rendered.
>
> I can't fault your logic so it's rendered.
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Girl rendered
Grass photographed
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
her face is so smooth that it's either botox or a render. The background seems
out of place, looks like a composition.
or perhaps it's just a photoshopped photo...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> EagleSun wrote:
> > Vector or real?
>
> Don't you mean "rendered or real"?
*thinking, then sighing* yes.... But technically, you have to have something to
render, which in case of Pov-Ray, often uses vectors to render.
Thanks for clearing it up.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"M_a_r_c" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:47838e82@news.povray.org...
> Grass photographed
No, there are model repeats in the grass - top right corner.
~Steve~
>
> Marc
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:53:58 +0100, "M_a_r_c" <jac### [at] wanadoofr>
wrote:
>Girl rendered
Are you sure? look at her hair just above her bust. And the wrinkles on the
tunic fastening.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message
news:1367o3p8v2610pklir4k14rkpr8pt9keb3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:53:58 +0100, "M_a_r_c"
> <jac### [at] wanadoofr>
> wrote:
>
>>Girl rendered
>
> Are you sure? look at her hair just above her bust. And the wrinkles on
> the
> tunic fastening.
>
> Regards
> Stephen
... And the top part of the head looks real to me, along with the stitching
on the tunic.
As Nemesis mentioned, the face looks a little smooth, but some touching up
in photoshop could make a photo look like that.
The various repititions down the top half of the right hand side are
strange. They don't look like a straight photoshop cut and paste, but it
doesn't really look to me like a modelled repeat either. Maybe a cut, paste
and some sophisticated merge in photoshop.
Following Warp's style of logic, I'm assuming it can't be all a photo,
otherwise the post would have started with 'Off-topic'. :-)
My guess would be the face and the hair on either side of the face are
rendered, the rest is a photo (with some photoshop cleaning done top right).
Regards,
Chris B.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "M_a_r_c" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> news:47838e82@news.povray.org...
>
>> Grass photographed
>
> No, there are model repeats in the grass - top right corner.
It could also be sloppy image manipulation of a photo.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
