 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This one is derived from sky_19. No radiosity this time. Scattering and
absorption are all White, so it it is only 'natural' colors. Only a few values
are different from sky_19. It might mean that nature's very sentitive.
Also, I am learning how to use my system myself, and how to draw rules that lead
to acceptable results.
When I feel confident enough, I'll write something about my method, and post the
code. I'll integrate it in the current state of TerraPOV.
As I type, I decide to name it pedantly BASS (Bruno's Atmospheric and Sky System
(better than Bruno's something ...)
Bruno.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sky_19_2.jpg' (46 KB)
Preview of image 'sky_19_2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bruno Cabasson napsal(a):
> This one is derived from sky_19. No radiosity this time. Scattering and
> absorption are all White, so it it is only 'natural' colors. Only a few values
> are different from sky_19. It might mean that nature's very sentitive.
>
> Also, I am learning how to use my system myself, and how to draw rules that lead
> to acceptable results.
>
> When I feel confident enough, I'll write something about my method, and post the
> code. I'll integrate it in the current state of TerraPOV.
>
> As I type, I decide to name it pedantly BASS (Bruno's Atmospheric and Sky System
> (better than Bruno's something ...)
>
> Bruno.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
The clouds look like a painting
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, wow. I really love this one. They are painterly, and have a definite
dimensionality to them. The whole sky is dramatic, and the clouds make a great
image all by themselves --- but I can see putting something in front of them;
they wouldn't drown out a scene, just highlight it. Brilliant work. I'm waiting
with baited breath to hear about you methods.
--
Sam Bleckley
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just wanted to say that this whole series has been very inspiring. I
especially like the little tendrils you have illuminated at the edges of the
main cloud on this one. Well done!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Smws" <smw### [at] pobox com> wrote:
> I just wanted to say that this whole series has been very inspiring. I
> especially like the little tendrils you have illuminated at the edges of the
> main cloud on this one. Well done!
Thanks!
I still have a long work to do to improve my model and its implementation. As I
said in another post, I must learn to use it myself!
Atmospherically yours
Bruno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Bruno:
I have worked a lot trying to get a good macro for the skies. After some
experiments I arrived nowhere so any time I need a sky I start from zero. And I
was wondering if you are thinking of providing the pov code in a friendly macro.
Because your skies are amazing...
Thanks and congratulations...
http://personales.ya.com/robertoullan/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
