 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's a much improved version. Rendering time: 7 hours, rendered in two
halves. The only thing I did in photoshop was to take a depth map of the image
and apply the lens blur filter. It's almost necessary to separate out the rear
face of the sphere. Too busy without it and too long of a render with the real
focal blur. With double the mesh resolution, the artifacts went away in this
version. I'm pleased with the result overall, but what do you think? Ideas?
Suggestions?
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'symmetry2.jpg' (92 KB)
Preview of image 'symmetry2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
much improved. looks like wax sculpture.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Here's a much improved version. Rendering time: 7 hours, rendered in two
> halves.
And FYI, there was pretty heavy antialiasing in the original, but the lens blur
seems to have caused some aliasing. So it wouldn't take the full seven hours
to produce an image with this level of aliasing.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's a true piece of art!
Congratulations, very beautiful.
"triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.47235fd96b58f7af88727a860@news.povray.org...
> Here's a much improved version. Rendering time: 7 hours, rendered in two
> halves. The only thing I did in photoshop was to take a depth map of the
> image
> and apply the lens blur filter. It's almost necessary to separate out the
> rear
> face of the sphere. Too busy without it and too long of a render with the
> real
> focal blur. With double the mesh resolution, the artifacts went away in
> this
> version. I'm pleased with the result overall, but what do you think?
> Ideas?
> Suggestions?
HDRI and a fly around animation would be nice to try I guess, but you'd
probably have to do something about the render time
>
> - Ricky
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi - that is gorgeous! It looks like coral to me. Thanks for sharing it!
"triple_r" <rre### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.47235fd96b58f7af88727a860@news.povray.org...
> Here's a much improved version. Rendering time: 7 hours, rendered in two
> halves. The only thing I did in photoshop was to take a depth map of the
image
> and apply the lens blur filter. It's almost necessary to separate out the
rear
> face of the sphere. Too busy without it and too long of a render with the
real
> focal blur. With double the mesh resolution, the artifacts went away in
this
> version. I'm pleased with the result overall, but what do you think?
Ideas?
> Suggestions?
>
> - Ricky
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful!
F
triple_r wrote:
> Here's a much improved version. Rendering time: 7 hours, rendered in two
> halves. The only thing I did in photoshop was to take a depth map of the image
> and apply the lens blur filter. It's almost necessary to separate out the rear
> face of the sphere. Too busy without it and too long of a render with the real
> focal blur. With double the mesh resolution, the artifacts went away in this
> version. I'm pleased with the result overall, but what do you think? Ideas?
> Suggestions?
>
> - Ricky
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
