POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Radiosity Server Time
5 Nov 2024 08:28:13 EST (-0500)
  Radiosity (Message 1 to 9 of 9)  
From: o bb spammed
Subject: Radiosity
Date: 21 Aug 2007 14:30:01
Message: <web.46cb2ecbb18a8134bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
I saw 'Sphere Cluster' over on http://www.slimeland.com/ and really liked
the idea, so I thought I'd play around with it some.  Here the spheres are
on a grid with a random height and size.  I like Slime's version better,
but the idea is right.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '1.png' (276 KB)

Preview of image '1.png'
1.png


 

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 21 Aug 2007 14:35:01
Message: <web.46cb2f6f4485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I saw 'Sphere Cluster' over on http://www.slimeland.com/ and really liked
> the idea, so I thought I'd play around with it some.  Here the spheres are
> on a grid with a random height and size.  I like Slime's version better,
> but the idea is right.

And here's one with the light inside a cluster of colored spheres.  I like
this one better than my first one.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '4.png' (182 KB)

Preview of image '4.png'
4.png


 

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 21 Aug 2007 15:30:01
Message: <web.46cb3c494485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > I saw 'Sphere Cluster' over on http://www.slimeland.com/ and really liked
> > the idea, so I thought I'd play around with it some.  Here the spheres are
> > on a grid with a random height and size.  I like Slime's version better,
> > but the idea is right.
>
> And here's one with the light inside a cluster of colored spheres.  I like
> this one better than my first one.

And one with a scene.  This is still a wip.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '3.png' (496 KB)

Preview of image '3.png'
3.png


 

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 21 Aug 2007 18:50:01
Message: <web.46cb6c044485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > "o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > > I saw 'Sphere Cluster' over on http://www.slimeland.com/ and really liked
> > > the idea, so I thought I'd play around with it some.  Here the spheres are
> > > on a grid with a random height and size.  I like Slime's version better,
> > > but the idea is right.
> >
> > And here's one with the light inside a cluster of colored spheres.  I like
> > this one better than my first one.
>
> And one with a scene.  This is still a wip.

A different version


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '6.png' (584 KB)

Preview of image '6.png'
6.png


 

From: Slime
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 21 Aug 2007 23:45:30
Message: <46cbb15a$1@news.povray.org>
Cool. I like the second version the best for the colors. It looks like the
first one needs higher quality radiosity settings.

 - Slime
 [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Ross
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 22 Aug 2007 17:54:18
Message: <46ccb08a$1@news.povray.org>
this and the last one are curiously interesting. keep it up :)


Post a reply to this message

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 22 Aug 2007 19:55:00
Message: <web.46cccb6f4485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"Ross" <rli### [at] speakeasynet> wrote:
> this and the last one are curiously interesting. keep it up :)

:o)

I like the broad-stroke effect of the images, but the moon doesn't seem to
fit in.  Here's an attempt at a bit more unified scene.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '9.jpg' (132 KB)

Preview of image '9.jpg'
9.jpg


 

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 23 Aug 2007 12:30:01
Message: <web.46cdb51c4485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote:
> Cool. I like the second version the best for the colors. It looks like the
> first one needs higher quality radiosity settings.
>
>  - Slime
>  [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]

Upping the settings makes a huge difference, both in quality and time to
render.  This took nearly 8 hours to render at 2560x2048, whereas it took
maybe 30 minutes before.  I think I'll stick to admiring yours :o)  Thanks
for the inspiration though


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '2.png' (239 KB)

Preview of image '2.png'
2.png


 

From: o bb spammed
Subject: Re: Radiosity
Date: 24 Aug 2007 12:30:01
Message: <web.46cf06914485a72bc81efaa0@news.povray.org>
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Ross" <rli### [at] speakeasynet> wrote:
> > this and the last one are curiously interesting. keep it up :)
>
> :o)
>
> I like the broad-stroke effect of the images, but the moon doesn't seem to
> fit in.  Here's an attempt at a bit more unified scene.

Last one.  I used the technique described here
http://www.nolights.de/stills/makingof/rose/rose.html
I think it turned out well enough.  Time to move on :o)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '10.jpg' (218 KB)

Preview of image '10.jpg'
10.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.