POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : space station Server Time
16 Nov 2024 14:19:44 EST (-0500)
  space station (Message 1 to 10 of 19)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 9 Messages >>>
From: Meothuru
Subject: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 00:50:02
Message: <web.45fe23f56a5da0c569c539b50@news.povray.org>
A fictive space station inklusive the
project archive


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'srs.jpg' (71 KB)

Preview of image 'srs.jpg'
srs.jpg


 

From: Meothuru
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 00:55:01
Message: <web.45fe24a517398f3a69c539b50@news.povray.org>
"Meothuru" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> A fictive space station inklusive the
> project archive

An here is the ZIP


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'srs_project_archiv.zip' (17 KB)

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 02:54:08
Message: <45fe41a0$1@news.povray.org>
Nice.
However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station. No 
gravity to walk around!!!
A Moon base? But then what are the attitude jets for??

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Meothuru
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 04:45:01
Message: <web.45fe5ae517398f3ae664f210@news.povray.org>
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> Nice.
> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station. No
> gravity to walk around!!!
> A Moon base? But then what are the attitude jets for??
>
> Thomas

Do not wonder...
This space station must be a station in a very far, far
away future (because it is builded by the ESA ;-))
And in this future it is possible to generate a artificial
gravity on the platform.
So the astronauts can walk an play billard on this platform.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 06:00:02
Message: <web.45fe6cf817398f3af1cb1e660@news.povray.org>
"Meothuru" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> A fictive space station inklusive the
> project archive

Nice but a couple of things that might improve it.
Your lights and shadows could use some attention. The solar panel will be at
right angles to the sun so there should be a large shadow on the deck.
Because there is no atmosphere in space the shadows should be deep and
sharp (The ambient for your textures should be 0 or very close). The
pillbox structure with the open door would, I imagine, have an airlock. So
you should not be able to see inside.


Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Verm
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 08:24:58
Message: <45fe8f2a$1@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Nice.
> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station. No 
> gravity to walk around!!!
Magnetic boots of course.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 10:27:55
Message: <45feabfb$1@news.povray.org>
"Verm" <pov### [at] thirteeendynucom> schreef in bericht 
news:45fe8f2a$1@news.povray.org...
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Nice.
>> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station. 
>> No gravity to walk around!!!
> Magnetic boots of course.

Ah yes. Terrible stuff, and not very confortable  :-)  I prefer artificial 
gravity (but I am spoiled)

But in both cases, that bannister is not necessary!!! You cannot fall from 
the platform...!

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Ger
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 13:59:02
Message: <45fedd74@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot wrote:

> 
> "Verm" <pov### [at] thirteeendynucom> schreef in bericht
> news:45fe8f2a$1@news.povray.org...
>> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> Nice.
>>> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station.
>>> No gravity to walk around!!!
>> Magnetic boots of course.
> 
> Ah yes. Terrible stuff, and not very confortable  :-)  I prefer artificial
> gravity (but I am spoiled)
> 
> But in both cases, that bannister is not necessary!!! You cannot fall from
> the platform...!
> 
Leave it to the dumb to achieve the impossible :)
-- 
Ger


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 19 Mar 2007 16:34:06
Message: <45ff01ce$1@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 19-03-2007 11:27:
> "Verm" <pov### [at] thirteeendynucom> schreef in bericht 
> news:45fe8f2a$1@news.povray.org...
>> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> Nice.
>>> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space station. 
>>> No gravity to walk around!!!
>> Magnetic boots of course.
> 
> Ah yes. Terrible stuff, and not very confortable  :-)  I prefer artificial 
> gravity (but I am spoiled)
> 
> But in both cases, that bannister is not necessary!!! You cannot fall from 
> the platform...!
> 
> Thomas 
> 
> 
You can't fall from the paltform, but you can FLOAT away from it if you step off 
of it.

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Bend the facts to fit the conclusion. It's easier that way.


Post a reply to this message

From: Larry Hudson
Subject: Re: space station
Date: 20 Mar 2007 02:23:57
Message: <45ff8c0d$1@news.povray.org>
Verm wrote:
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
> 
>> Nice.
>> However, I wonder what that platform is for, if this is a space 
>> station. No gravity to walk around!!!
> 
> Magnetic boots of course.

Or heavy boots.   Check this link...     :-)

http://milk.com/wall-o-shame/heavy_boots.html

      -=- Larry -=-


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 9 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.