 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The resolution for the volume data I used is 32x32x32 (in a df3 file).
The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'randombinflow.jpg' (48 KB)
Preview of image 'randombinflow.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I re-rendered other two pictures with the same data set...
This one used the method of:
function{ // untested
( dens(x,y,z)
+dens(x+0.05,y,z) + dens(x-0.05,y,z)
+dens(x,y+0.05,z) + dens(x,y-0.05,z)
+dens(x,y,z+0.05) + dens(x,y,z-0.05)
)/7
}
interpolate was set to 1.
"lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> The resolution for the volume data I used is 32x32x32 (in a df3 file).
>
> The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'inter 1.jpg' (0 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The seconde image is rendered with:
function {(dens(x,y,z)} and interpolate was set to 2.
When creating both of these two images, the max_gradient messages were
watched and tuned to make sure there were no holes on the isosurface.
"lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> The resolution for the volume data I used is 32x32x32 (in a df3 file).
>
> The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'inter 2.jpg' (59 KB)
Preview of image 'inter 2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
need to re-upload the image
"lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I re-rendered other two pictures with the same data set...
>
> This one used the method of:
> function{ // untested
> ( dens(x,y,z)
> +dens(x+0.05,y,z) + dens(x-0.05,y,z)
> +dens(x,y+0.05,z) + dens(x,y-0.05,z)
> +dens(x,y,z+0.05) + dens(x,y,z-0.05)
> )/7
> }
> interpolate was set to 1.
>
>
> "lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > The resolution for the volume data I used is 32x32x32 (in a df3 file).
> >
> > The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
> >
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'inter_1.jpg' (19 KB)
Preview of image 'inter_1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
lien0n nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 18-01-2007 22:47:
> need to re-upload the image
>
> "lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> I re-rendered other two pictures with the same data set...
>>
>> This one used the method of:
>> function{ // untested
>> ( dens(x,y,z)
>> +dens(x+0.05,y,z) + dens(x-0.05,y,z)
>> +dens(x,y+0.05,z) + dens(x,y-0.05,z)
>> +dens(x,y,z+0.05) + dens(x,y,z-0.05)
>> )/7
>> }
>> interpolate was set to 1.
>>
>>
>> "lien0n" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>>> The resolution for the volume data I used is 32x32x32 (in a df3 file).
>>>
>>> The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
>>>
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Interpolate 1 means linear interpolation (tri-linear).
If you set interpolate 2 (tri-cubic interpolation) you should get a more rounded
result.
Give it a try and chose whitch one is beter for your situation.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
EVERYTHING HAS A GENDER
You may not know this but many nonliving things have a gender...
A Web Page is Female, because it's always getting hit on.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain <ele### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> >>> The detailed information for why putting the image here can be refered to
> >>>
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.45a4a43af46d0e7d1524ae1d0%40news.povray.org%3E/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> Interpolate 1 means linear interpolation (tri-linear).
> If you set interpolate 2 (tri-cubic interpolation) you should get a more rounded
> result.
> Give it a try and chose whitch one is beter for your situation.
>
> --
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
Yes, I got the same information that interpolate 2 should result in more
rounded effect from the document, but the image above says no. And, I don't
know why the result looks so terrible.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
