 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Haven't posted for a while, but there's some lovely stuff appearing here.
Great saxophones, Jim's terminally intricate chalice and I love Ken's
chocolate. Very appetising!
Anyway, here's a couple of pretty pictures that have emerged from recent
work. They're intended as ingredients to a larger picture, so fine detail
is not particularly important since they'll probably appear very small in
final form. Firstly, medieval-type castle banners, blowing in the wind...
Bill
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'bannertest.jpg' (70 KB)
Preview of image 'bannertest.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
....and secondly, a Wright glider, hopefully to be found soaring on the
thermals!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'glider.jpg' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'glider.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I can only hope they'll find their way into your knot-world! Nice job, I
especially like that plane.
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Anyway, here's a couple of pretty pictures that have emerged from recent
> work. They're intended as ingredients to a larger picture, so fine detail
> is not particularly important since they'll probably appear very small in
> final form. Firstly, medieval-type castle banners, blowing in the wind...
>
Those banners are intriguing. They're all different; did you hand-make each
one? Or is it some kind of random technique, perturbing a single object
somehow?
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Those banners are intriguing. They're all different; did you hand-make each
> one? Or is it some kind of random technique, perturbing a single object
> somehow?
They're bicubic patches. First I choose a direction for the wind, then push
the control points in that direction semi-randomly. The top corners are not
touched, to give the impression of being anchored. I wrote a macro to
generate them given basic parameters (size, degree of perturbation etc). It
probably looks a lot cleverer than it is!
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
