POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : More demolition Server Time
5 Nov 2024 00:25:34 EST (-0500)
  More demolition (Message 1 to 10 of 13)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>
From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: More demolition
Date: 17 Jan 2006 11:25:01
Message: <web.43cd19392f62a380731f01d10@news.povray.org>
Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
you! ;)

Bill


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'demolish3.jpg' (83 KB)

Preview of image 'demolish3.jpg'
demolish3.jpg


 

From: Hasan3
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 17 Jan 2006 12:05:00
Message: <web.43cd22ae17971ecf9ee4f5770@news.povray.org>
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
> little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
> you! ;)
>
> Bill


Bill, very nice... is this a macro? And is there any physics?
if yes, can you share ?

Regards.
Hasan


Post a reply to this message

From: Florian Brucker
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 17 Jan 2006 14:07:13
Message: <43cd4061@news.povray.org>
Good work, but those images cry for motion blur!


Greetings,
Florian


Post a reply to this message

From: Dan Byers
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 17 Jan 2006 23:15:00
Message: <web.43cdc01317971ecfb3e3f10e0@news.povray.org>
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
> little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
> you! ;)
>
> Bill

I keep looking for a bullet streaking across the screen. :)
--
Dan
GoofyGraffix.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 02:25:00
Message: <web.43cdecbb17971ecf1f99adeb0@news.povray.org>
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
> little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
> you! ;)
>
> Bill

Must be our caveman ancestry.  ;-)

Really liking what you've done. Was wondering if gravity was part of the
set-up?  (Or maybe I'm just not noticing its effects.)

More! More! Bash! Destroy!

Ken


Post a reply to this message

From: Kenneth
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 03:00:00
Message: <web.43cdf4b417971ecf1f99adeb0@news.povray.org>
BTW, I've been working on an explosion of my own (heh heh.) With
media-sphere dust trails. Not quite ready yet, but I'll post when done.

Let's see...looking at your image, and venturing a *guess* as to the basics
of how it's done, I would say...

the bricks are all moving in the "+cannonball" direction according to how
near they are to the cannonball-travel axis...closer means more movement.
(Random, of course.)  And they fan out in a cone shape, each stone's random
distance in those two directions depending on how far each is from the
center(?) of the castle cylinder (or perhaps from the point of entry.)

So...am I triumphantly crossing the drawbridge toward the gate, or am I
still on the other side of the moat?

Ken


Post a reply to this message

From: aaglo
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 03:35:00
Message: <web.43cdfcaa17971ecfb3ed5a4f0@news.povray.org>
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
> little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
> you! ;)
>
> Bill
That's quite a lot of debris.
Have you tried your code, when there already exists a hole (like a window
hole) in your tower? And if so, how does it look then?


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 10:35:00
Message: <web.43ce5f4417971ecf731f01d10@news.povray.org>
"Hasan3" <PRO### [at] Yahoocom> wrote:

> Bill, very nice... is this a macro? And is there any physics?
> if yes, can you share ?
The macro simply defines a translation as a function of how close a given
point is to a straight line (the 'bullet' trajectory). This translation is
calculated and applied to bricks as they are generated when building the
chimney. There is no physics, but as Mike Williams pointed out, there could
easily be with only slight modifications. I'll try to make it more friendly
before sharing...

Bill


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 10:35:01
Message: <web.43ce5f6d17971ecf731f01d10@news.povray.org>
Florian Brucker <tor### [at] torfboldcom> wrote:
> Good work, but those images cry for motion blur!
Thanks! I thought that too...

Bill


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: More demolition
Date: 18 Jan 2006 10:45:00
Message: <web.43ce619317971ecf731f01d10@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> the bricks are all moving in the "+cannonball" direction according to how
> near they are to the cannonball-travel axis...closer means more movement.
Exactly right.

> (Random, of course.)  And they fan out in a cone shape, each stone's random
> distance in those two directions depending on how far each is from the
> center(?) of the castle cylinder (or perhaps from the point of entry.)
Not quite. Each brick starts at its correct position within the tower. Their
movement along the cannonball axis is calculated as a function of their
distance from the axis - it's a one-off translation, no time-factor is
used. Two random vector components orthogonal to the cannonball axis are
scaled with the distance to produce the fanning-out effect. As mentioned
before, there is no gravity.

Smoke and mirrors!

Bill


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 3 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.