 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you're not familiar with:
http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_bio_43.html
http://www.toutfait.com/unmaking_the_museum/Door,%2011%20rue%20Larrey.html
best viewing and some new other images too:
http://rene.bui.free.fr/index_en.html (click digital)
nice week end !
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'porte.jpg' (119 KB)
Preview of image 'porte.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
uhm, you're trying to say this isn't a photo?
cu!
--
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x) // ZK http://www.povplace.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> uhm, you're trying to say this isn't a photo?
Maybe not the left one, but look closer the right one:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Personally, I loathe Duchamp. Epitomizes all that is pretentious as
hell in the 'art' world, particularly that damned urinal. If anybody
can call that art, it's the original designer, not Duchamp, even if he
did turn it on its side. I was an illustration major when at university
for two years, and the 'art' teachers were constantly going "oh,
illustration...that's not ART". :P
However, your image here...that's just amazing. I had to sit looking at
your full-sized version on the webpage for a while before convincing
myself that yes, it is in fact CGI. (repeating floor texture)
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
extremely convincing, excellent work!
Only if somebody looks carefully, some minor flaws can be seen.
So it is a bit disturbing, that the room with direct sunlight is dark,
whereas the other room is bright, despite getting indirect light only.
I think, you will not post the source, but perhaps you can post the camera,
light and radiosity settings.
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rene Bui" <ren### [at] free fr> wrote:
> If you're not familiar with:
> http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_bio_43.html
> http://www.toutfait.com/unmaking_the_museum/Door,%2011%20rue%20Larrey.html
>
> best viewing and some new other images too:
> http://rene.bui.free.fr/index_en.html (click digital)
>
> nice week end !
Amazing, one (or two) of the most photorealistic renders I have ever seen. I
had to convince myself they were not photo's (still not 100%) by looking at
the study images etc on your site. Is the outside scene HDR?
Great work..
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rene Bui" <ren### [at] freefr> schreef in bericht
news:web.43c8cb0465527aa4a48392cd0@news.povray.org...
> If you're not familiar with:
> http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_bio_43.html
> http://www.toutfait.com/unmaking_the_museum/Door,%2011%20rue%20Larrey.html
>
> best viewing and some new other images too:
> http://rene.bui.free.fr/index_en.html (click digital)
>
> nice week end !
>
Impressive work!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
WOW!
The image on the left CAN'T be CGI! Kept looking for *any* sign of
artificiality, but gave up. Stunning! Is that a Poser figure standing in
the courtyard?
I'm glad someone else pointed out the repeating wood floor texture in the
right-hand image...'cause I wouldn't have seen it otherwise.. As has
already been said: Two of the most realistic renders I've laid eyes on.
Lots of work there!
I think the lighting in the room view is logical. The bright green room has
a large window, facing something very reflective outside. The darker room
must have dark walls, and a smaller window. Very nice contrast between the
two.
Most inspiring.
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Among other things, Rene Bui saw fit to write:
> If you're not familiar with:
> http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_bio_43.html
> http://www.toutfait.com/unmaking_the_museum/Door,%2011%20rue%20Larrey.html
>
> best viewing and some new other images too:
> http://rene.bui.free.fr/index_en.html (click digital)
Can you ever close both doors in the right picture?
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:bat### [at] badulaqueunexes...
> Can you ever close both doors in the right picture?
Nope it's a *paradoxal* door : it can be open and closed at the same time.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
