POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Surreal Server Time
5 Nov 2024 00:27:11 EST (-0500)
  Surreal (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Nexus
Subject: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 05:05:01
Message: <web.43c77b10e06415c0a928330b0@news.povray.org>
Hey all. This is my 2nd image and I'm pleased with the progress I'm making.
This is nothing fancy, just a couple of bizarre objects floating around,
but I like how it turned out. Especially the reflections off the glass
things.

Let me know what you think, especially things I could do better. I'm
inexperienced so I don't quite know what pitfalls to look out for.

Thanks,

Nexus


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'surreal.png' (334 KB)

Preview of image 'surreal.png'
surreal.png


 

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 05:30:46
Message: <da0fs11ek0cgsd835vq2t25thfmvqico8d@4ax.com>
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:04:00 EST, "Nexus" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

>Let me know what you think, especially things I could do better.

Nice, I want to see a cyclic animation with everything rotating,
please.


Post a reply to this message

From: Lonnie
Subject: Re: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 11:35:01
Message: <web.43c7d5b543faf899328c25a60@news.povray.org>
Are you using "looks_like" light sources for the glowing balls, or just high
ambience?  Either way it looks good.


Post a reply to this message

From: Smws
Subject: Re: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 11:45:00
Message: <web.43c7d85643faf8997dceea40@news.povray.org>
"Nexus" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Hey all. This is my 2nd image and I'm pleased with the progress I'm making.
> This is nothing fancy, just a couple of bizarre objects floating around,
> but I like how it turned out. Especially the reflections off the glass
> things.
>
> Let me know what you think, especially things I could do better. I'm
> inexperienced so I don't quite know what pitfalls to look out for.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nexus

It looks very good. Are the twisty glass objects sphere-sweeps, isosurfaces,
or what? They do indeed look nice with all the reflections.

I think the background is not quite right- the texture seems too "simple"
for the scene, or wrong somehow. I don't really know what to suggest
instead, though. (I am not that experienced either.) Would it be very
difficult to put the object in a simple landscape or room? I think that
might look very good.

-Stefan


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v2
Subject: Re: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 15:13:08
Message: <43c809d4$1@news.povray.org>
Well, it's certainly interesting! (More than can be said for most of the 
things *I* do, sadly.)


Post a reply to this message

From: Nexus
Subject: Re: Surreal
Date: 13 Jan 2006 16:00:01
Message: <web.43c8143243faf8994dfbd4440@news.povray.org>
Lonnie wrote:
>Are you using "looks_like" light sources for the glowing balls, or just high
>ambience?  Either way it looks good.

The glowing balls are emissive media with light sources in the middle.

Stefan wrote:
>Are the twisty glass objects sphere-sweeps, isosurfaces,
>or what? They do indeed look nice with all the reflections.

What I did was create a single hook object using sphere-sweep. I then merged
two of them together to get the twisty glass things. The single hook was
also used to create the hooks on the bronze triangular things.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.