POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Experimenting with new features for rendering planets Server Time
5 Nov 2024 18:26:01 EST (-0500)
  Experimenting with new features for rendering planets (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: EagleSun
Subject: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 30 May 2005 00:55:00
Message: <web.429a9c41bb7ba549df1ddebd0@news.povray.org>
Just learned how to do atmospheres and the surface of planets.... and yes I
cheated a little.. made atmosphere more artistic than real.... but well....
still working on it....

Enjoy...


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '3planets_2005-05-29.jpg' (52 KB)

Preview of image '3planets_2005-05-29.jpg'
3planets_2005-05-29.jpg


 

From: Slime
Subject: Re: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 30 May 2005 01:39:23
Message: <429aa70b$1@news.povray.org>
I like the first two a lot. The third looks good but strange, as every
earlier picture I've seen of that planet (Jupiter?) didn't have a bright
glow around it.

 - Slime
 [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Matthias Weißer
Subject: Re: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 30 May 2005 11:29:24
Message: <429b3154@news.povray.org>
Slime schrieb:
> I like the first two a lot. The third looks good but strange, as every
> earlier picture I've seen of that planet (Jupiter?) didn't have a bright
> glow around it.

I also like the first two. But Jupiter looks strange. I think tahts 
because Jupiter hasn't a atmosphere, moreover Jupiter is out of 
atmosphere ;-)


-- 

mat### [at] matweide
http://www.matwei.de


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 30 May 2005 18:44:03
Message: <429b9733$1@news.povray.org>

> Slime schrieb:
> 
>> I like the first two a lot. The third looks good but strange, as every
>> earlier picture I've seen of that planet (Jupiter?) didn't have a bright
>> glow around it.
> 
> 
> I also like the first two. But Jupiter looks strange. I think tahts 
> because Jupiter hasn't a atmosphere, moreover Jupiter is out of 
> atmosphere ;-)
> 
> 
Jupiter does have an atmosphere, in fact, it's all you see. It's a REALY thick one,
loaded with 
clouds biger than the earth to a deepth you can't realy conceive: >100 times earth
diameter deep!
In the Jupiter view, the "atmosphere" shown would be deeper than the earth is whide.

Alain


Post a reply to this message

From: dlm
Subject: Re: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 30 May 2005 20:01:16
Message: <429ba94c$1@news.povray.org>
Bjorn Jonsson's planetary renderings site is worth more than a second 
glance.
There are some really good images and rendering of planets with atmosphere 
at http://www.mmedia.is/~bjj/
The jupiter images at http://www.mmedia.is/~bjj/3dtest/jup_atmos.jpg are 
illuminating - very subtle bluish tinge on the illuminated edge.
A bunch more are at http://www.mmedia.is/~bjj/jupsys_rend.html

DLM

"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote in message 
news:429aa70b$1@news.povray.org...
>I like the first two a lot. The third looks good but strange, as every
> earlier picture I've seen of that planet (Jupiter?) didn't have a bright
> glow around it.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Cousin Ricky
Subject: Re: Experimenting with new features for rendering planets
Date: 31 May 2005 22:10:01
Message: <web.429d186189aa4a9e43a5e2560@news.povray.org>
Alain <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote:

> Jupiter does have an atmosphere, in fact, it's all you see. It's a REALY thick one,
loaded with
> clouds biger than the earth to a deepth you can't realy conceive: >100 times earth
diameter deep!
> In the Jupiter view, the "atmosphere" shown would be deeper than the earth is whide.

Please review your references.  Earth's diameter is 12,756 km, and Jupiter's
is 142,984 km.  That leaves only 5.6 Earths to the center.

More realistically, the Great Red Spot is 2.5 to 3 Earths across.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.