 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After many stops/starts of rendering (because I was too bored and wanted to
use my PC for something else), my povcomp 2004 entry using isosufaces
(instead of surface normals) has finally finished. I think the final trace
time was approximately 6-8 weeks+about a week to generate the radiosity
data (P4 2.66Ghz 768 MB Ram). Phew!!! Anyway, not entirely sure the extra
time was worth it as the difference is fairly subtle, but I thought I would
post it somewhere as it took sooooo long..
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'museum.jpg' (507 KB)
Preview of image 'museum.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 16 May 2005 08:06:08
Message: <42888cb0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The lightning effect is remarkable!
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks,
I forgot to post a link to the original photograph I modelled this from. The
photograph can be found at:
http://www.mines.edu/students/m/mgardine/London/Natural%20History%20Museum.JPG
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Ross
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 16 May 2005 10:51:33
Message: <4288b375$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well this clearly looks better than the entry for povcomp. I'm not sure if
thats attributed to the isosurfaces or just the quality at which you
rendered it. beautiful work!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: St
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 16 May 2005 14:57:59
Message: <4288ed37@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think what you've done in this image is fantastic!
You've captured a mood, and that mood is to do with the lighting.
Nice. Great modelling, etc. etc...
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Fernando G del Cueto
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 16 May 2005 17:51:02
Message: <428915c6$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stunning. I'm truly impressed.
Fernando
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very impressive work - and you've reminded my wife that the next time
we're in the UK, we need to go visit this museum. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 16 May 2005 22:46:28
Message: <42895b04$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Excellent composition, in the way the statue is handled thematically to the
rest of the building.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Marneus Calgar
Subject: Re: Finally my isosurface POVCOMP 2004 entry has finished rendering..
Date: 17 May 2005 03:26:19
Message: <42899c9b$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Stunning. I'm truly impressed.
>
> Fernando
+1 !!!
--
Dark Skull Software
http://www.darkskull.net
A+
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ross" <rli### [at] everestkc net> wrote:
> Well this clearly looks better than the entry for povcomp. I'm not sure if
> thats attributed to the isosurfaces or just the quality at which you
> rendered it. beautiful work!
I think you are right that it is partly down to a higher quality render
(resolution and focal blur settings) but I also think the isosurfaces add a
bit more to the textures (this could probably have been done almost as well
by using better surface normals than I had in the povcomp entry, I didn't
really do much work on the normals because I was planning to enter it with
the isosurfaces till I ran out of time..)
Thanks for the comments everyone, makes me glad I posted it :-) and yes the
Natural History museum is well worth a visit if you are in the UK.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
