 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'liquids_wife_tn.jpg' (20 KB)
Download 'liquids_wife.jp2.dat' (99 KB)
Preview of image 'liquids_wife_tn.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IMBJR wrote:
These don't look like POV-Ray images.
Perhaps a code-post to prove it?
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:52:26 -0500, Dan P <dan### [at] yahoo com>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>
>These don't look like POV-Ray images.
>Perhaps a code-post to prove it?
Just because they do not look like it, does not mean that they are not
it. This is a POV image newsgroup remember.
I think if one can get away with something looking non-POV then one
has achieved a certain goal. However, in this instance, there was a
small degree of post-production - not a durty phrase in my book.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Doctor Morbius wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:52:26 -0500, Dan P <dan### [at] yahoocom>
> wrote:
<
>>IMBJR wrote:
>>
>>These don't look like POV-Ray images.
>>Perhaps a code-post to prove it?
>
> Just because they do not look like it, does not mean that they are not
> it. This is a POV image newsgroup remember.
Right. Your image doesn't look like it is made in POV-Ray. *Shrug*
> I think if one can get away with something looking non-POV then one
> has achieved a certain goal. However, in this instance, there was a
> small degree of post-production - not a durty phrase in my book.
You kids and your secret passwords.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
