 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Strange. I don't know why this ended up as 16-bit. I turned the
+FN16(?) to +FN and it still gave me 16-bits.
I did read in the POV documentation today, by coincidence, that this
would happen - but for some reason I was a little skeptical: surely,
POV would not give the deepest colour depth for a format unless
directly told to do so - unless +FN is stating that and I didn't
realise.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rgb_of_death.jp2.dat' (99 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spam here> wrote in message
news:rs1q40h51g4gbiv8pt3jva7meea8rv35q9@4ax.com...
>
> Strange. I don't know why this ended up as 16-bit. I turned the
> +FN16(?) to +FN and it still gave me 16-bits.
>
> I did read in the POV documentation today, by coincidence, that this
> would happen - but for some reason I was a little skeptical: surely,
> POV would not give the deepest colour depth for a format unless
> directly told to do so - unless +FN is stating that and I didn't
> realise.
An interesting image. I see why you need the additional color depth. The
blue bar on the right might not be as subtle limited to 256 shades.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Striking and scary at the same time. Nice use of colours for a
nightmare scenario like this - that's how I see it anyway...
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan P wrote:
> An interesting image. I see why you need the additional color depth. The
> blue bar on the right might not be as subtle limited to 256 shades.
That is of course _if_ there was hardware to show more than
8bits/channel. Did you mean that you have such a videcard?
Severi
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I couldn't see it.
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:rs1q40h51g4gbiv8pt3jva7meea8rv35q9@4ax.com...
>
> Strange. I don't know why this ended up as 16-bit. I turned the
> +FN16(?) to +FN and it still gave me 16-bits.
>
> I did read in the POV documentation today, by coincidence, that this
> would happen - but for some reason I was a little skeptical: surely,
> POV would not give the deepest colour depth for a format unless
> directly told to do so - unless +FN is stating that and I didn't
> realise.
>
> --------------------------------
> My First Subgenius Picture Book:
> http://www.imbjr.com
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:24:28 -0600, "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom>
wrote:
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:rs1q40h51g4gbiv8pt3jva7meea8rv35q9@4ax.com...
>>
>> Strange. I don't know why this ended up as 16-bit. I turned the
>> +FN16(?) to +FN and it still gave me 16-bits.
>>
>> I did read in the POV documentation today, by coincidence, that this
>> would happen - but for some reason I was a little skeptical: surely,
>> POV would not give the deepest colour depth for a format unless
>> directly told to do so - unless +FN is stating that and I didn't
>> realise.
>
>An interesting image. I see why you need the additional color depth. The
>blue bar on the right might not be as subtle limited to 256 shades.
You really need to read the text that comes with a posting. Read it
and realise that the 16-bit aspect was a mistake.
Wittering on like that makes you look like an ignorant fool.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Somehow these jp2 postings make me think of Bill Dewitt..........
no trolling intended, but I can't help it :(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:13:14 +0100, "Apache"
<apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Somehow these jp2 postings make me think of Bill Dewitt..........
>
>
>no trolling intended, but I can't help it :(
Do tell. Seriously. I'm interested.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bizarrely, I had thought just the same! - I meant to post a message about it
but clicked the wrong button and it tried to send to IMBJR directly - but
didnt because he's entered a fake e-mail address.
Will IMBJR suffer the same fate, I wonder...
-Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Severi Salminen" <sev### [at] NOT_THISsibafi> wrote in message
news:404da43b$1@news.povray.org...
> Dan P wrote:
>
> > An interesting image. I see why you need the additional color depth. The
> > blue bar on the right might not be as subtle limited to 256 shades.
>
> That is of course _if_ there was hardware to show more than
> 8bits/channel. Did you mean that you have such a videcard?
>
> Severi
I actually think I might. I'm not sure -- I know the video card I have is
pretty beefy and over $400.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
