From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Art under construction
Date: 9 Jun 2013 07:28:44
Message: <51b466ec@news.povray.org>
On 9-6-2013 13:09, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> Comments welcome.>
This is a fascinating concept. The relationship between the underlying
canvas and the paint 'sculpture' is still a bit unclear maybe but worth
exploring further. There are tantalizing drips upon the canvas...
Thomas
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Comments welcome.
Is that a true windblown catenary on the right side?
("Catenary" isn't in /any/ of my spell checkers. Interesting. (They also don't
know that there is a generic word "christ" is not capitalized.))
From: Nekar Xenos
Subject: Re: Art under construction
Date: 9 Jun 2013 13:06:20
Message: <op.wye8gtauufxv4h@xena>
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:38:20 +0200, Cousin Ricky <rickysttATyahooDOTcom>
wrote:
> "Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:>> Comments welcome.>> Is that a true windblown catenary on the right side?>> ("Catenary" isn't in /any/ of my spell checkers. Interesting. (They > also don't> know that there is a generic word "christ" is not capitalized.))>
It's a bicubic patch. I just judged it by eye.. It was difficult to try
and get the grain to follow the curvature of the canvas, but I managed it
with black-hole warps.
All the elements of a painting are there canvas, frame and paint. Just a
bit different...
--
-Nekar Xenos-
From: Nekar Xenos
Subject: Re: Art under construction
Date: 9 Jun 2013 13:14:10
Message: <op.wye8tu2hufxv4h@xena>
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 13:28:43 +0200, Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg>
wrote:
> On 9-6-2013 13:09, Nekar Xenos wrote:>> Comments welcome.>>>> This is a fascinating concept. The relationship between the underlying > canvas and the paint 'sculpture' is still a bit unclear maybe but worth > exploring further. There are tantalizing drips upon the canvas...>> Thomas>
Yes I think I'll put less paint on the left to reveal more of the canvas
and frame on the left.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
com> wrote: