 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 07:31:39 +0200, Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom>
> wrote:
>
> Not enough strokes here. But as soon as I have a lot of strokes it just
> looks like the original images.
>
> I think the white brightens it up nicely :)
>
WOW! That is looking *so* painterly; what a change from even the previous
render. The blobby paint strokes are looking superb. It's definitely abstract
and Jackson Pollock-ish. But more...understandable!
You may have arrived at new painting 'style' ;-)
Only one suggestion now: Eliminate what looks like the gray plane that bisects
the image; it detracts from the otherwise outstanding results. (IMHO, of
course.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 13 May 2013 07:31:39 +0200, Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
> Comments and suggestions welcome.
Added fog and sky. Using a different stroke direction and more strokes.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'artists - copy (6).png' (1217 KB)
Preview of image 'artists - copy (6).png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 14 May 2013 06:03:34 +0200, Kenneth <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 07:31:39 +0200, Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Not enough strokes here. But as soon as I have a lot of strokes it just
>> looks like the original images.
>>
>> I think the white brightens it up nicely :)
>>
>
> WOW! That is looking *so* painterly; what a change from even the previous
> render. The blobby paint strokes are looking superb. It's definitely
> abstract
> and Jackson Pollock-ish. But more...understandable!
>
> You may have arrived at new painting 'style' ;-)
=D
> Only one suggestion now: Eliminate what looks like the gray plane that
> bisects
> the image; it detracts from the otherwise outstanding results. (IMHO, of
> course.)
>
See my next image :)
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-5-2013 19:47, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> I still do the real thing though ...
Aaah! That is the real artist speaking! ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Surrealism! A touch of Yves Tanguy.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 07:31:39 +0200, Nekar Xenos <nek### [at] gmailcom>
> wrote:
>
> Added fog and sky. Using a different stroke direction and more strokes.
>
I think I still like image (5) better. It's the paint strokes--they look much
more like natural drips there, quite beautiful. In image (6) the drips look too
directional IMO. My very first impression of it was that the white areas now
look like...snow. Not sure why I think that (an optical illusion?), but it
struck me that way. Just my two-cents' worth. Beauty is in 'the eye of the
beholder' of course; *everyone* will have a different opinion of one sort or
another. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 14 May 2013 09:12:48 +0200, Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg>
wrote:
> Surrealism! A touch of Yves Tanguy.
Thanks :)
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Artists - 3d painting (WIP)
Date: 14 May 2013 17:12:50
Message: <5192a8d2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
s.day wrote:
> This has given me a good idea for my moss placement, the shape of each clump of
> moss was a bit square for my liking (as I just used trace over a rectangular
> area), didn't think about using an image to place the moss.
you could try using a bozo / noise pattern for the probability
(instead of fixed probability over rectangle)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kenneth wrote:
> I've been giving some thought to an idea: a built-in POV-ray 'tool' that uses a
> greatly-modified combination of trace and eval_pigment, to actually find the
> color that has *already been applied* to an object in 3-D space.
I think on SDL level this can only be solved if all assignments
of pigments to objects and all transformations of objects are made
through macros of your eval system.
OTOH internally POV-Ray should already have all data available after
an object including its transformations are parsed, so it should be
feasible in principle to implement an eval_object_pigment function
within POV-Ray itself that honors the transformations.
However, this begs the question what the pigment of an object
actually is (for example if layered textures have been applied).
I think the normal case is that the contribution of each texture
including finish / lighting will be merged. So it may not always
be uniquely defined what the "pigment" should be be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Added fog and sky. Using a different stroke direction and more strokes.
Oh man,
this is developing into something really original!
It is remindful of a 3D version of Gena Onukhov's
"http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2005-08-31/gomnmlsm.jpg".
Please try to apply different stroke types and it can be really outstanding.
Phantastic innovation! I'll apply it on some of my own images, as soon I'll find
time (beside family and company)...
Please go further!!
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
