 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the Nova looks better now.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'nova echo c.jpg' (874 KB)
Preview of image 'nova echo c.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmail com> schreef in bericht
news:op.vthyunqxufxv4h@xena...
>I think the Nova looks better now.
Yes.
Something I noticed: The ship hulls seem to show the basic mesh structure
through the texture. You might need to subdivide more. In this case, Poseray
would give the easiest and fastest results. Otherwise, you will need to
subdivide in Wings3D, but take into account that sharp edges are needed.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:06:58 +0200, Thomas de Groot
<tDOTdegroot@interdotnlanotherdotnet> wrote:
>
> "Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> schreef in bericht
> news:op.vthyunqxufxv4h@xena...
>> I think the Nova looks better now.
>
> Yes.
>
> Something I noticed: The ship hulls seem to show the basic mesh structure
> through the texture. You might need to subdivide more. In this case,
> Poseray
> would give the easiest and fastest results. Otherwise, you will need to
> subdivide in Wings3D, but take into account that sharp edges are needed.
>
Thanks, Thomas. I think I'll use PoseRay.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I think the Nova looks better now.
>
> --
> -Nekar Xenos-
The rings could use some work, IMO.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
