 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mca### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:web.4322c8f99fdfae965fe5ff9c0@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
>> "Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> schreef in bericht
>> news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
>> > Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites.
>>
>>
>> I am baffled!!!
>> Whatever I do, the POV-Ray site still tells me that Minimalism is the
>> round.
>> I cannot get it updated (which means I cannot get to the judging part of
>> the
>> Minimalism round... :-(
>> Anybody knows what is the matter?
>>
>> Thomas
>
> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
>
> I worked it out from a post by Tom Melly in one of the IRTC ng's
And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
~Steve~
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:59:47 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
I noticed that when I was voting. A few names (I think) that said they
would enter were not there. Mind you 90 odd entries means a lot of
voting.
Ask for a recount
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen McAvoy" <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:r2r5i1p17t1idjbf6d7qp8oj4uo702dgfn@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:59:47 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>> And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
>
> I noticed that when I was voting. A few names (I think) that said they
> would enter were not there. Mind you 90 odd entries means a lot of
> voting.
> Ask for a recount
I don't think it's a recount that's needed, it's whether or not they
received the images, and if so, why weren't they processed? I've just
checked my sent items folder and sure enough, they're sitting there, dated
30/8/05, and all pointing to the correct address. I didn't get any
'accepted' emails. The only thing I can think of is that I sent three images
originally, and then discovered that I'd sent one wrong image, so I sent the
right one and asked for the wrong one to be deleted. But I can't see that
this would interfere with anything.
Ah well, I might email them, but I'm not hassled by it, I'll give it a
couple more days to see what's happening.
~Steve~
>
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:14:35 -0400, St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> I don't think it's a recount that's needed, it's whether or not they
> received the images, and if so, why weren't they processed? I've just
> checked my sent items folder and sure enough, they're sitting there,
> dated 30/8/05, and all pointing to the correct address. I didn't get any
> 'accepted' emails. The only thing I can think of is that I sent three
> images originally, and then discovered that I'd sent one wrong image, so
> I sent the right one and asked for the wrong one to be deleted. But I
> can't see that this would interfere with anything.
>
> Ah well, I might email them, but I'm not hassled by it, I'll give it
> a couple more days to see what's happening.
>
>
> ~Steve~
IRTC really needs to get with the program. It's 2005. There is NO reason
for the IRTC to not have e.g. web-based file submissions.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> wrote in message
news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
> IRTC really needs to get with the program. It's 2005. There is NO reason
> for the IRTC to not have e.g. web-based file submissions.
They do have this: http://www.irtc.org/cgi-bin/irtc_submit_stills/2
( ps. sorry for hijacking your thread Tyler, that's twice I've done that
this year! <slaps wrist> )
~Steve~
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:14:35 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> I don't think it's a recount that's needed, it's whether or not they
>received the images, and if so, why weren't they processed?
I for one would not mind waiting longer to get it sorted out. Since
I've done the voting on 92 entries one or two more won't hurt :-)
Maybe you should start an other thread to get a straw poll.
[snip]
> Ah well, I might email them, but I'm not hassled by it, I'll give it a
>couple more days to see what's happening.
Well the longer you wait the less chance there is to get it fixed
(IMHO). There is an end date.
Votes will be accepted during the period 1 September through 20
September 2005.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
>
> I worked it out from a post by Tom Melly in one of the IRTC ng's
One image has been added since I last looked two days ago - so there's
hope yet! :)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:21 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
>>
>> I worked it out from a post by Tom Melly in one of the IRTC ng's
>
> One image has been added since I last looked two days ago - so there's
>hope yet! :)
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
And all my votes have been reset to "not voted yet" Drat!
I am going on holiday tomorrow so I probably will not get to finish
voting :-(
The count has gone from 93 to 96.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:43:18 +0100, Stephen McAvoy <mca### [at] aolcom>
wrote:
>The count has gone from 93 to 96.
That may be from 94 to 96. I cannot view the two new ones.
12 Catenoids and Study in Black
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen McAvoy" <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:hnpci1pqrck0cmap55la4urklva1jm9c13@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:44:21 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
>>>
>>> I worked it out from a post by Tom Melly in one of the IRTC ng's
>>
>> One image has been added since I last looked two days ago - so there's
>>hope yet! :)
>>
>> ~Steve~
>>
>>
> And all my votes have been reset to "not voted yet" Drat!
> I am going on holiday tomorrow so I probably will not get to finish
> voting :-(
> The count has gone from 93 to 96.
Well, at least we know they're alive and kicking Steve - Have a great
holiday!
~Steve~
>
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
