 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 20:55:16 -0400, Larry Hudson <org### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> Tyler Eaves wrote:
>> Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites. I've decided to do a
>> railway-themed entry. I started modeling today and have made I think a
>> good amount of progress for a single afternoon.
>> ...
>
> Waaaay too dark. Can't see a thing -- just a big black blob. :-(
>
> (Don't think it's _my_ monitor... Most images here show up fine.)
>
> -=- Larry -=-
See if this is any better. This is my lastest render. Using assumed_gamma
2.2, as well as much more lighting.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rs1-4.jpg' (149 KB)
Preview of image 'rs1-4.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tyler Eaves nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-09-06 21:35:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 20:55:16 -0400, Larry Hudson <org### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>
>> Tyler Eaves wrote:
>>
>>> Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites. I've decided to do a
>>> railway-themed entry. I started modeling today and have made I think
>>> a good amount of progress for a single afternoon.
>>> ...
>>
>>
>> Waaaay too dark. Can't see a thing -- just a big black blob. :-(
>>
>> (Don't think it's _my_ monitor... Most images here show up fine.)
>>
>> -=- Larry -=-
>
>
>
> See if this is any better. This is my lastest render. Using
> assumed_gamma 2.2, as well as much more lighting.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Much beter! Clearer that with the brightness cranked to the max!
On to the bogeys and fuel thanks and couplings.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> schreef in bericht
news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
> Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites.
I am baffled!!!
Whatever I do, the POV-Ray site still tells me that Minimalism is the round.
I cannot get it updated (which means I cannot get to the judging part of the
Minimalism round... :-(
Anybody knows what is the matter?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've just been to www.IRTC.org and it still says is that the "Current stills
competition ends 31 August 2005 Current stills topic is Minimalism"
I can't find any mention of the IRTC on www.povray.org...
Where did you see the new round's topic (Opposites)?
Rarius
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote in message
news:43229168@news.povray.org...
>
> "Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> schreef in bericht
> news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
>> Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites.
>
>
> I am baffled!!!
> Whatever I do, the POV-Ray site still tells me that Minimalism is the
> round.
> I cannot get it updated (which means I cannot get to the judging part of
> the
> Minimalism round... :-(
> Anybody knows what is the matter?
>
> Thomas
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rarius" <rar### [at] rariuscouk> wrote in message
news:4322b1cf@news.povray.org...
> Where did you see the new round's topic (Opposites)?
You can see it here: http://irtc.org/ftp/.message
~Steve~
>
> Rarius
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
> "Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> schreef in bericht
> news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
> > Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites.
>
>
> I am baffled!!!
> Whatever I do, the POV-Ray site still tells me that Minimalism is the round.
> I cannot get it updated (which means I cannot get to the judging part of the
> Minimalism round... :-(
> Anybody knows what is the matter?
>
> Thomas
http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mca### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.4322c8f99fdfae965fe5ff9c0@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
>> "Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] mailshackcom> schreef in bericht
>> news:op.### [at] localhostlocaldomain...
>> > Well, the new IRTC round is Oppisites.
>>
>>
>> I am baffled!!!
>> Whatever I do, the POV-Ray site still tells me that Minimalism is the
>> round.
>> I cannot get it updated (which means I cannot get to the judging part of
>> the
>> Minimalism round... :-(
>> Anybody knows what is the matter?
>>
>> Thomas
>
> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2005-08-31/view.html
>
> I worked it out from a post by Tom Melly in one of the IRTC ng's
And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
~Steve~
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:59:47 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
I noticed that when I was voting. A few names (I think) that said they
would enter were not there. Mind you 90 odd entries means a lot of
voting.
Ask for a recount
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen McAvoy" <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:r2r5i1p17t1idjbf6d7qp8oj4uo702dgfn@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:59:47 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>> And if that's the completed list, mine aren't there. :o(
>
> I noticed that when I was voting. A few names (I think) that said they
> would enter were not there. Mind you 90 odd entries means a lot of
> voting.
> Ask for a recount
I don't think it's a recount that's needed, it's whether or not they
received the images, and if so, why weren't they processed? I've just
checked my sent items folder and sure enough, they're sitting there, dated
30/8/05, and all pointing to the correct address. I didn't get any
'accepted' emails. The only thing I can think of is that I sent three images
originally, and then discovered that I'd sent one wrong image, so I sent the
right one and asked for the wrong one to be deleted. But I can't see that
this would interfere with anything.
Ah well, I might email them, but I'm not hassled by it, I'll give it a
couple more days to see what's happening.
~Steve~
>
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:14:35 -0400, St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> I don't think it's a recount that's needed, it's whether or not they
> received the images, and if so, why weren't they processed? I've just
> checked my sent items folder and sure enough, they're sitting there,
> dated 30/8/05, and all pointing to the correct address. I didn't get any
> 'accepted' emails. The only thing I can think of is that I sent three
> images originally, and then discovered that I'd sent one wrong image, so
> I sent the right one and asked for the wrong one to be deleted. But I
> can't see that this would interfere with anything.
>
> Ah well, I might email them, but I'm not hassled by it, I'll give it
> a couple more days to see what's happening.
>
>
> ~Steve~
IRTC really needs to get with the program. It's 2005. There is NO reason
for the IRTC to not have e.g. web-based file submissions.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
