 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Disscusion in povray.general
--
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'lotnisko_a.jpg' (25 KB)
Preview of image 'lotnisko_a.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 01:13:54
Message: <41ba9022$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> Disscusion in povray.general
Rafal what program are you using to post these attachments? This post
and your last post have appeared as pure UUencoded text for me. I've
used a separate decoder, UUdecode.exe, to uncompress your image and I've
attached it however it seems even then there are problems. When I tried
to decode your last post with UUdecode.exe it also came out with lots of
artifacts. Are you using a nonstandard UUencoding format?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'lotnisko_a.jpg' (25 KB)
Preview of image 'lotnisko_a.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: GrimDude
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 02:26:49
Message: <41baa139$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
He's using Xnews. His post looks fine in Outlook Express, but your reply
butchered his image.
Rafal, I remember there is a fix for this, but haven't recalled what it is,
yet. There are a million ways to approach the problem, though. Seems like it
was an hf_grey_16 use that cured it (in global settings), but I'm not sure.
- Grim
"Thomas Lake" <smi### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:41ba9022$1@news.povray.org...
> Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
>> Disscusion in povray.general
>
> Rafal what program are you using to post these attachments? This post
> and your last post have appeared as pure UUencoded text for me. I've
> used a separate decoder, UUdecode.exe, to uncompress your image and I've
> attached it however it seems even then there are problems. When I tried
> to decode your last post with UUdecode.exe it also came out with lots of
> artifacts. Are you using a nonstandard UUencoding format?
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alain
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 09:28:32
Message: <41bb0410@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
GrimDude nous apporta ses lumieres ainsi en ce 2004-12-11 02:26... :
>He's using Xnews. His post looks fine in Outlook Express, but your reply
>butchered his image.
>
>Rafal, I remember there is a fix for this, but haven't recalled what it is,
>yet. There are a million ways to approach the problem, though. Seems like it
>was an hf_grey_16 use that cured it (in global settings), but I'm not sure.
>
>- Grim
>
>
hf_grey_16 is good for generating the hight field image, not for using
it. It enable you to have 65536 hight values instead of only 256.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: GrimDude
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 12:40:07
Message: <41bb30f7$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alain" <aze### [at] qwertygov> wrote in message
news:41bb0410@news.povray.org...
> hf_grey_16 is good for generating the hight field image, not for using it.
> It enable you to have 65536 hight values instead of only 256.
>
> Alain
Oh, my mistake then. I took it that he was generating a height_field. Of
course, I was always chastised for making height_field generation harder
than it should be.
- Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 12:52:52
Message: <41bb33f4$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:41bb30f7$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Alain" <aze### [at] qwertygov> wrote in message
> news:41bb0410@news.povray.org...
> > hf_grey_16 is good for generating the hight field image, not for using
it.
> > It enable you to have 65536 hight values instead of only 256.
> >
> > Alain
>
> Oh, my mistake then. I took it that he was generating a height_field. Of
> course, I was always chastised for making height_field generation harder
> than it should be.
>
> - Grim
>
>
It is a pov feature which allow you to render a grayscale image starting
from a procedural pigment.
see pov doc 6.11.4 (hint: a most important word in the 1st paragraph is
"other") :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Dec 2004 18:00:06
Message: <41bb7bf6@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
GrimDude wrote:
> He's using Xnews. His post looks fine in Outlook Express, but your reply
> butchered his image.
I know the image in my reply looks awful but I clearly stated that this
was obviously not how Rafal's original image looked liked. For some
reason Thunderbird is unable to decode the post.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: David Burnett
Subject: Re: height_field smooth black spots problem - 1 attachment
Date: 13 Dec 2004 13:49:46
Message: <41bde44a@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> GrimDude wrote:
>
>> He's using Xnews. His post looks fine in Outlook Express, but your
>> reply butchered his image.
> was obviously not how Rafal's original image looked liked. For some
> reason Thunderbird is unable to decode the post.
>
Probably because the uuencoded bit was part of the signature.
Dave
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
