 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jeffry Reifel
Subject: First Post-Checkers play'n with spears
Date: 19 Aug 2003 20:08:41
Message: <3f42bc09@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It just keeps getting harder to be original.
http://www.geocities.com/jareifel
fog{22rgb z}#macro _(J,E,F)sphere{J,1,1rotate z*E-20translate<F,0,24-A>
pigment{rgb 9/A}}#end#local B=-1;blob{#while(B<1)#local C=6*sin(B*5+3);
#local A=3*abs(sin(B*3));_(<B-A,C-7*B-1>2,-4)_(<2*sin(B*3-1)+B,3*sin(B*
3-3)+2*B>,-22,-1)_(<A+B C-7*B>9,1)_(<A+B,C-7*B>9,5)#local B=B+.01;#end}
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'chequers.jpg' (44 KB)
Preview of image 'chequers.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is a horrible horrible pun, but very original idea. Those are very nice
checker pieces btw.
--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
#macro _(r)#if(r<12)#local i=asc(substr(
"oqshilacefg",r,1))-97;disc{<mod(i,7)-3,
div(i,7)-1,6>,z,.4pigment{rgb 10}}_(r+1)
#end#end _(1)//KL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: First Post-Checkers play'n with spears
Date: 20 Aug 2003 01:33:29
Message: <3f430829@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kevin Loney wrote:
> That is a horrible horrible pun, but very original idea. Those are
> very nice checker pieces btw.
Horibble pun? Maybe its so bad I don't get it or maybe its cause I don't
play checkers, where's the pun?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> Kevin Loney wrote:
>> That is a horrible horrible pun, but very original idea. Those are
>> very nice checker pieces btw.
>
> Horibble pun? Maybe its so bad I don't get it or maybe its cause I
> don't play checkers, where's the pun?
Oh wait a sec are you talking about the "light shed"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas Lake" <smi### [at] hotmail com> wrote in news:3f43086b$1
@news.povray.org:
>> Horibble pun? Maybe its so bad I don't get it or maybe its cause I
>> don't play checkers, where's the pun?
>
>
>
Sphere...Spear
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20 Aug 2003 02:08:17 -0400, Tom Galvin <tom### [at] imporg> typed
the following:
> "Thomas Lake" <smi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in news:3f43086b$1
> @news.povray.org:
>
> >> Horibble pun? Maybe its so bad I don't get it or maybe its
> >cause I> don't play checkers, where's the pun?
>
> Sphere...Spear
How about plane...play'n? Ooh, gotta love those horrible puns! :D
-Kedar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
spear = wee pun
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alf Peake
Subject: Re: First Post-Checkers play'n with spears
Date: 20 Aug 2003 10:40:09
Message: <3f438849@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's a great pic. I love the puns.
A pity you included a genuine plane though, it seems to be
surplus-to-requirements.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jeffry Reifel" <JAR### [at] emailmsncom> wrote in news:3f438538$1
@news.povray.org:
> spear = wee pun
>
wee groan
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Chris Johnson
Subject: Re: First Post-Checkers play'n with spears
Date: 20 Aug 2003 19:13:52
Message: <3f4400b0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
play'n with spears.... oh dear oh dear....
Very nice image though - just a few of things which I think could improve
it. There appears to be a discontinuity at the elbow of the arms. If the
arms are made of two cones, and the two cones have the same radius at the
elbow, you can correct this by putting a sphere at the elbow. Actually
looking again, you may have done this - its quite hard to see without having
the file at a huge resolution.
There could also be some signs of the spear having pierced the red checker -
if thats a height map (or even bump map) making the crown, you could put a
large indent at the right place quite easily. Again, you may have already
done this, but its quite hard to see at newsgroup-posting sizes.
The wood texture on the spears could be shrunk a little?
Very impressive overall though.
-Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
