 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello,
Just some small 'experiments':
The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
a testing with negative ior.
On my raytracing homepage are high resolution versions of these images
and some more.
Sven
--
Homepages
Raytracing: http://www.sternenwanderer.com/
Gaming: http://www.sirius666.de/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'furry-2002-03-10-low.jpg' (91 KB)
Download 'negative-ior-2002-03-05-low.jpg' (34 KB)
Preview of image 'furry-2002-03-10-low.jpg'
Preview of image 'negative-ior-2002-03-05-low.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I really like the radiating cone spheres, did you just rotate the individual
cones randomly?
~Sam
Sven Heinzel <tra### [at] sirius666 de> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] sirius666de...
> Hello,
>
> Just some small 'experiments':
> The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> a testing with negative ior.
>
> On my raytracing homepage are high resolution versions of these images
> and some more.
>
> Sven
>
> --
> Homepages
> Raytracing: http://www.sternenwanderer.com/
> Gaming: http://www.sirius666.de/
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some of my favorite scenes are the simplest. In other words, I like the spheres image.
:)
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oooh, they look like those soft koosh-koosh balls or whatever they're
called, the elasticy things. =)
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> a testing with negative ior.
Is negative ior possible in real life?
- Kevin R.
"Sven Heinzel" <tra### [at] sirius666de> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] sirius666de...
> Hello,
>
> Just some small 'experiments':
> The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> a testing with negative ior.
>
> On my raytracing homepage are high resolution versions of these images
> and some more.
>
> Sven
>
> --
> Homepages
> Raytracing: http://www.sternenwanderer.com/
> Gaming: http://www.sirius666.de/
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kevin R." <$vjr#spam#iggle@mtcn$spam$et.net#> wrote in message
news:3c9a668e@news.povray.org...
> > The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> > a testing with negative ior.
> Is negative ior possible in real life?
>
Yes
here are some links for negative IOR and also semi-related 'slow' light
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/14/9/12 -IOR
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/14/9/8 - slow light
jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Is negative ior possible in real life?
No, indexes of refraction are always >= 1 in real life.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, but the likelihood of your ever coming across such a material is extremely low.
Grim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oops, apparently I'm wrong =) read the next few responses
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cool! Thanks!
- Kevin R.
"jimbobjim" <jim### [at] blueyondercouk> wrote in message
news:3c9a6d9a@news.povray.org...
>
> "Kevin R." <$vjr#spam#iggle@mtcn$spam$et.net#> wrote in message
> news:3c9a668e@news.povray.org...
> > > The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image
is
> > > a testing with negative ior.
> > Is negative ior possible in real life?
> >
>
> Yes
>
> here are some links for negative IOR and also semi-related 'slow' light
>
> http://physicsweb.org/article/world/14/9/12 -IOR
>
> http://physicsweb.org/article/world/14/9/8 - slow light
>
> jim
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
