POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : rolling right along... Server Time
31 Oct 2024 19:27:59 EDT (-0400)
  rolling right along... (Message 1 to 10 of 12)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>
From: Dan Byers
Subject: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 15:04:56
Message: <B93B8534.CF55%goofygrafx@aol.com>
... this is a variation of the "Three Amigos" work from earlier... this is
called "Alliance"... again, more blob craziness (there are only two blobs,
with billions of components each)... and as always, your love or hate is
appreciated, or at least duly noted :)

-- 
dan
http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'alliance.jpg' (52 KB)

Preview of image 'alliance.jpg'
alliance.jpg


 

From: Timothy R  Cook
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 15:10:37
Message: <3D161D2D.2060101@bellsouth.net>
Dan Byers wrote:
> ... this is a variation of the "Three Amigos" work from earlier... this is
> called "Alliance"... again, more blob craziness (there are only two blobs,
> with billions of components each)... and as always, your love or hate is
> appreciated, or at least duly noted :)

An analysis:

At left; peas, sculpted into a cake, with onion slices on top.
Top-right; coarsely-ground beef, raw, with that new green ketchup.
Bottom; yellow bumpy triangle with dark blue spiral.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Slime
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 15:22:19
Message: <3d161feb@news.povray.org>
These are pretty neat. I think it'd be neat if you made large versions for
desktop backgrounds (1600x1200 preferably, 1024x768 doesn't really cover
everyone, and we can always make it smaller if necessary =)

 - Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Kevin Loney
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 15:22:24
Message: <3d161ff0@news.povray.org>
Cool

I know people who wear earrings that look like that. But they look millions
of times better as abstract art than ear lobe ornaments.

--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
#macro _(r)#if(r<12)#local i=asc(substr("oqshilacefg",r,1))-97;
disc{<mod(i,7)-3,div(i,7)-1,6>,z,.4pigment{rgb 10}}_(r+1)
#end#end _(1)//KL


Post a reply to this message

From: Timothy R  Cook
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 16:04:07
Message: <3D1629B7.70708@bellsouth.net>
Slime wrote:
> (1600x1200 preferably, 1024x768 doesn't really cover
> everyone, and we can always make it smaller if necessary =)

Windows does have a 'stretch to fit' option for wallpapers,
and uses bilinear resampling to do so, so a 1024x768 image
can look decent even at 1920 x 1440.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Hugo
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 17:31:57
Message: <3d163e4d$1@news.povray.org>
> Windows does have a 'stretch to fit' option for wallpapers,
> and uses bilinear resampling to do so, so a 1024x768 image
> can look decent even at 1920 x 1440.

Not my version of Windows.. Maybe XP? But my motto is: Never trust
non-specialized software, such as Windows, to do things such as graphics.


Regards,
Hugo


Post a reply to this message

From: Daniel Matthews
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 19:15:52
Message: <1365334.UaWtBD8IcP@3-e.net>
te he he, can't recognise corn when you see it?

Timothy R. Cook wrote:

> Dan Byers wrote:
>> ... this is a variation of the "Three Amigos" work from earlier... this
>> is called "Alliance"... again, more blob craziness (there are only two
>> blobs, with billions of components each)... and as always, your love or
>> hate is appreciated, or at least duly noted :)
> 
> An analysis:
> 
> At left; peas, sculpted into a cake, with onion slices on top.
> Top-right; coarsely-ground beef, raw, with that new green ketchup.
> Bottom; yellow bumpy triangle with dark blue spiral.
> 
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
> mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
> 
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
> N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
> PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
> D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

-- 
Your connection failed because: disks spinning backwards - toggle the 
hemisphere jumper.


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Hertel
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 20:04:54
Message: <3d166226@news.povray.org>
> > Windows does have a 'stretch to fit' option for wallpapers,
> > and uses bilinear resampling to do so, so a 1024x768 image
> > can look decent even at 1920 x 1440.
A 1024 image strecthed to 1152 doesn't look good at all on my win2k..

> Not my version of Windows.. Maybe XP? But my motto is: Never trust
> non-specialized software, such as Windows, to do things such as graphics.
Wasn't stretching introduced in Win98? It's in win2k too, (the
stretch-option has disapperead at my computer at work.. strange..)  I like
using a smaller image (works best with an abstract image) and stretch it,
because then you don't have to use 5mb of memory for a wallpaper you rarely
look at :-)

-Peter


Post a reply to this message

From: Dan Byers
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 22:57:36
Message: <B93BF3FE.CF6F%goofygrafx@aol.com>
in article 3D1### [at] bellsouthnet, Timothy R. Cook at
z99### [at] bellsouthnet wrote on 6/23/02 2:10 PM:

> Dan Byers wrote:
>> ... this is a variation of the "Three Amigos" work from earlier... this is
>> called "Alliance"... again, more blob craziness (there are only two blobs,
>> with billions of components each)... and as always, your love or hate is
>> appreciated, or at least duly noted :)
> 
> An analysis:
> 
> At left; peas, sculpted into a cake, with onion slices on top.
> Top-right; coarsely-ground beef, raw, with that new green ketchup.
> Bottom; yellow bumpy triangle with dark blue spiral.

it's like you were in the same room when I was creating this!  amazing! :)

-- 
dan
http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx


Post a reply to this message

From: Dan Byers
Subject: Re: rolling right along...
Date: 23 Jun 2002 22:59:09
Message: <B93BF45C.CF70%goofygrafx@aol.com>
in article 3d161ff0@news.povray.org, Kevin Loney at klo### [at] pt2mcom wrote on
6/23/02 2:20 PM:

> Cool
> 
> I know people who wear earrings that look like that. But they look millions
> of times better as abstract art than ear lobe ornaments.
> 
> --
> Kevin
> http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
> #macro _(r)#if(r<12)#local i=asc(substr("oqshilacefg",r,1))-97;
> disc{<mod(i,7)-3,div(i,7)-1,6>,z,.4pigment{rgb 10}}_(r+1)
> #end#end _(1)//KL
> 
> 

thanks for the compliment... at least, I _think_ it was a compliment ;)

-- 
dan
http://hometown.aol.com/goofygrafx


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.