From: Timothy R Cook
Subject: Re: The Fecker [detail, no nudity]
Date: 29 Sep 2002 13:13:30
Message: <3d9734ba@news.povray.org>
IMBJR wrote:
> Just in case you wundered "Why?".
I suppose those little streamers qualify this little fan for not being
nude...otherwise I'd question your 'no nudity' tag. ;)
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
From: Peter Hertel
Subject: Re: The Fecker [detail, no nudity]
Date: 29 Sep 2002 15:43:05
Message: <3d9757c9$1@news.povray.org>
> > Just in case you wundered "Why?".>> I suppose those little streamers qualify this little fan for not being> nude...otherwise I'd question your 'no nudity' tag. ;)>
Eek! You can see it's wireframe! =)
-Peter