|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-5-2019 0:37, Jörg "Yadgar" Bleimann wrote:
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 11.05.19 08:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
>> It is indeed a lur.
>
> ...oh, and he's got long red hair! Lovely, a true Celt! What's his name?
>
I have not been introduced to him, so I do not know his name
unfortunately. Many Celts were black haired by the way ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11-5-2019 18:33, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> On 2019-05-11 3:09 AM (-4), Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>> Wow! you have an excellent memory! ;-)
>
> Not so much excellent as unevenly distributed. People tell me I'd make
> an excellent Jeopardy! contestant. (Jeopardy! is an American game show
> dealing with knowledge trivia.) But when it comes to things that matter
> in real life, I have lifelong CRS (and now I'm at that age when I don't
> know if it's CRS or "senior moments").
Well, "senior moments" is something I am quite familiar with... :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 19-05-10 à 02:57, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> Last February, I presented some early renders of this scene. It has now
> been "finished" (my scenes are never finished).
>
Is there ANY on-trivial scene that is ever truly finished ?
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 19-05-12 à 02:49, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> On 12-5-2019 0:37, Jörg "Yadgar" Bleimann wrote:
>> Hi(gh)!
>>
>> On 11.05.19 08:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>>> It is indeed a lur.
>>
>> ...oh, and he's got long red hair! Lovely, a true Celt! What's his name?
>>
>
> I have not been introduced to him, so I do not know his name
> unfortunately. Many Celts were black haired by the way ;-)
>
Yes, but the soap they used to wash them tended to make them turn some
other colour, like blond or some red/redish shades.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-5-2019 22:41, Alain wrote:
> Le 19-05-10 à 02:57, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
>> Last February, I presented some early renders of this scene. It has
>> now been "finished" (my scenes are never finished).
>>
>
> Is there ANY on-trivial scene that is ever truly finished ?
>
> Alain
I guess not.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> > > The sky is really nice - how did you made it?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Norbert
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Three elements compose the sky (and atmosphere) from base to top:
> > 1) a ground fog, slightly tilted to fill the distant valleys more);
> > 2) An atmospheric haze;
> > 3) a cloud layer.
> >
> > All three are made up of non-interpenetrating media. The code looks like
> > this (watch out for unwanted line feeds!):
> >
>
> > --
> > Thomas
>
>
> This sky is slow, but gives fantastic results - surely it was hard work to get
> it right.
> Many thanks for it. In fact, its beauty reminds me a bit of an old Mick
> Hazelgrove source (cannot find it on the server) - Kingz. Here is my last
> interpretation of his sky code (of course it would need work on the bottom of
> the cloud container...).
>
>
> Norbert
Could I have the source?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-5-2019 13:01, And wrote:
> "Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>
>>>> The sky is really nice - how did you made it?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Three elements compose the sky (and atmosphere) from base to top:
>>> 1) a ground fog, slightly tilted to fill the distant valleys more);
>>> 2) An atmospheric haze;
>>> 3) a cloud layer.
>>>
>>> All three are made up of non-interpenetrating media. The code looks like
>>> this (watch out for unwanted line feeds!):
>>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> This sky is slow, but gives fantastic results - surely it was hard work to get
>> it right.
>> Many thanks for it. In fact, its beauty reminds me a bit of an old Mick
>> Hazelgrove source (cannot find it on the server) - Kingz. Here is my last
>> interpretation of his sky code (of course it would need work on the bottom of
>> the cloud container...).
>>
>>
>> Norbert
>
>
> Could I have the source?
>
This is the original file from Mick Hazelgrove. I cannot find the ng post.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mh_clouds_original.zip' (2 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 13-5-2019 13:01, And wrote:
> > "Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> >> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> The sky is really nice - how did you made it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Norbert
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Three elements compose the sky (and atmosphere) from base to top:
> >>> 1) a ground fog, slightly tilted to fill the distant valleys more);
> >>> 2) An atmospheric haze;
> >>> 3) a cloud layer.
> >>>
> >>> All three are made up of non-interpenetrating media. The code looks like
> >>> this (watch out for unwanted line feeds!):
> >>>
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Thomas
> >>
> >>
> >> This sky is slow, but gives fantastic results - surely it was hard work to get
> >> it right.
> >> Many thanks for it. In fact, its beauty reminds me a bit of an old Mick
> >> Hazelgrove source (cannot find it on the server) - Kingz. Here is my last
> >> interpretation of his sky code (of course it would need work on the bottom of
> >> the cloud container...).
> >>
> >>
> >> Norbert
> >
> >
> > Could I have the source?
> >
>
> This is the original file from Mick Hazelgrove. I cannot find the ng post.
>
> --
> Thomas
Thanks!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If it hasn't been mentioned already, leaning the spears against the wall
at an angle like that is probably bad because of the risk of tripping
over them in an emergency. Better to lay them on the ground (wrapped in
canvas) or lean them upright against a stand or something. IMO.
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18-5-2019 9:19, Mike Horvath wrote:
> If it hasn't been mentioned already, leaning the spears against the wall
> at an angle like that is probably bad because of the risk of tripping
> over them in an emergency. Better to lay them on the ground (wrapped in
> canvas) or lean them upright against a stand or something. IMO.
>
I shall transmit to the High Command. :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |