|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |
These are actually perfectly round spheres, and a correct image, if you
view them with a 141.40 aspect ratio.
(I never post in this group, and I thought this was an interesting image).
--
dik
Rendered 1024 of 921600 pixels (0%)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ttsoc21007.png' (85 KB)
Preview of image 'ttsoc21007.png'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/537e7/537e7c06a68d0acad07e13f95960e9f8ba582cca" alt="ttsoc21007.png"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |
On 18/09/27 8:36 AM, dick balaska wrote:
> These are actually perfectly round spheres, and a correct image, if you
> view them with a 141.40 aspect ratio.
> (I never post in this group, and I thought this was an interesting image).
>
I'm normally not a huge fan of abstract art, but this would really fit
well in a museum!
for some reason I really like the 'glitchiness' in the middle of the image.
Post a reply to this message
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |