 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/12/2017 00:03, Alain wrote:
> Le 17-12-20 à 07:34, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 20/12/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 19-12-2017 3:43, Stephen wrote:
>>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>>
>>> It is strangely disturbing, isn't it?
>>>
>>
>> How about this?
>> I gave the one negative spotlight the shadowless keyword.
>> I don't understand why it is behaving like a point light and not
>> projecting a cone of negative light. :-(
>>
>>
>>
> It's a known isue. Any spotlight with the shadowless attribute become an
> ordinary light. I thing that the cylindrical light also display that
> problem.
> Don't ask me why.
>
Okay, I won't. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>
> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the black
> floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>
Like this?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'studio_vic2d_y_912a1m4_0000.png' (969 KB)
Preview of image 'studio_vic2d_y_912a1m4_0000.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/23/2017 02:37 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
>> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>
>> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the
>> black floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>>
>
> Like this?
No, although I like that floor.
In the original, I love the way the negative spotlights darken the floor
around her legs and feather off . Like a blast of black spray paint. But
the -spotlights don't do much for her herself.
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/12/2017 10:51, dick balaska wrote:
> On 12/23/2017 02:37 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the
>>> black floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>>>
>>
>> Like this?
>
> No, although I like that floor.
>
So do I. It gives it a burned, ancient look. I think.
> In the original, I love the way the negative spotlights darken the floor
> around her legs and feather off . Like a blast of black spray paint.
That's what I've been trying to get rid of. ;-)
It does look dramatic, though. The effect would add another dimension to
Mark Slone's December 2002 IRTC entry, "Innocent Shadow".
http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2002-12-31/ishadow.jpg
> But the -spotlights don't do much for her herself.
>
I agree, it was just the last scene I had been working on. It was
already set up.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> On 20/12/2017 09:52, And wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> Two negative spotlights in a scene
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Stephen
> >
> > This woman is more charming with the dark lights.
> >
> >
>
> Ah! You lean to the dark side, my friend. :-)
>
> Your preferences are noted. ;-)
>
> I like the way her legs look as if she was wearing black nylons.
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
It's alright.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
