 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20/12/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 19-12-2017 3:43, Stephen wrote:
>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>
> It is strangely disturbing, isn't it?
>
How about this?
I gave the one negative spotlight the shadowless keyword.
I don't understand why it is behaving like a point light and not
projecting a cone of negative light. :-(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'studio_vic2d_y_911b2a1m_0000.png' (273 KB)
Preview of image 'studio_vic2d_y_911b2a1m_0000.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> Two negative spotlights in a scene
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Nice effect, this is the first time I see negative shadows.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-12-2017 13:34, Stephen wrote:
> On 20/12/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 19-12-2017 3:43, Stephen wrote:
>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>
>> It is strangely disturbing, isn't it?
>>
>
> How about this?
> I gave the one negative spotlight the shadowless keyword.
> I don't understand why it is behaving like a point light and not
> projecting a cone of negative light. :-(
>
>
>
This is weird! A still from a horror film ;_)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 17-12-20 à 07:34, Stephen a écrit :
> On 20/12/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 19-12-2017 3:43, Stephen wrote:
>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>
>> It is strangely disturbing, isn't it?
>>
>
> How about this?
> I gave the one negative spotlight the shadowless keyword.
> I don't understand why it is behaving like a point light and not
> projecting a cone of negative light. :-(
>
>
>
It's a known isue. Any spotlight with the shadowless attribute become an
ordinary light. I thing that the cylindrical light also display that
problem.
Don't ask me why.
It should be noted that shadowless also disable highlights and photons
shooting for that light. That is documented.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
> Two negative spotlights in a scene
I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the black
floor but not on her (especially the wing).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/12/2017 00:03, Alain wrote:
> Le 17-12-20 à 07:34, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 20/12/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 19-12-2017 3:43, Stephen wrote:
>>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>>
>>> It is strangely disturbing, isn't it?
>>>
>>
>> How about this?
>> I gave the one negative spotlight the shadowless keyword.
>> I don't understand why it is behaving like a point light and not
>> projecting a cone of negative light. :-(
>>
>>
>>
> It's a known isue. Any spotlight with the shadowless attribute become an
> ordinary light. I thing that the cylindrical light also display that
> problem.
> Don't ask me why.
>
Okay, I won't. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>
> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the black
> floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>
Like this?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'studio_vic2d_y_912a1m4_0000.png' (969 KB)
Preview of image 'studio_vic2d_y_912a1m4_0000.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/23/2017 02:37 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
>> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>
>> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the
>> black floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>>
>
> Like this?
No, although I like that floor.
In the original, I love the way the negative spotlights darken the floor
around her legs and feather off . Like a blast of black spray paint. But
the -spotlights don't do much for her herself.
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24/12/2017 10:51, dick balaska wrote:
> On 12/23/2017 02:37 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 21/12/2017 09:39, dick balaska wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2017 09:43 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>>> Two negative spotlights in a scene
>>>
>>> I'm thinking about a double exposure. It would be cool to have the
>>> black floor but not on her (especially the wing).
>>>
>>
>> Like this?
>
> No, although I like that floor.
>
So do I. It gives it a burned, ancient look. I think.
> In the original, I love the way the negative spotlights darken the floor
> around her legs and feather off . Like a blast of black spray paint.
That's what I've been trying to get rid of. ;-)
It does look dramatic, though. The effect would add another dimension to
Mark Slone's December 2002 IRTC entry, "Innocent Shadow".
http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2002-12-31/ishadow.jpg
> But the -spotlights don't do much for her herself.
>
I agree, it was just the last scene I had been working on. It was
already set up.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 20/12/2017 09:52, And wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> Two negative spotlights in a scene
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Stephen
> >
> > This woman is more charming with the dark lights.
> >
> >
>
> Ah! You lean to the dark side, my friend. :-)
>
> Your preferences are noted. ;-)
>
> I like the way her legs look as if she was wearing black nylons.
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
It's alright.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
