 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
>
> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses
> after all. ;-)
>
You seem to have a problem Stephen. First b-l-obs, then that banner...
hmm? :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
>> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
>>
>> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses
>> after all. ;-)
>>
>
> You seem to have a problem Stephen.
You've just noticed? ;-)
> First b-l-obs, then that banner...
> hmm? :-)
>
That's dyslexia for you.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-11-2017 9:50, Stephen wrote:
> On 28/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>>>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
>>>
>>> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses
>>> after all. ;-)
>>>
>>
>> You seem to have a problem Stephen.
>
> You've just noticed? ;-)
>
>> First b-l-obs, then that banner... hmm? :-)
>>
>
>
> That's dyslexia for you.
>
Nobody is perfect.
[trips over own feet]
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'antony gormley sim_2_3.png' (442 KB)
Preview of image 'antony gormley sim_2_3.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.
Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at beginning
and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through here. Just
hope your not obsessing too much. :)
Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto this
would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've seen.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/11/2017 18:22, omniverse wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.
>
> Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at beginning
> and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through here. Just
> hope your not obsessing too much. :)
>
> Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto this
> would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've seen.
>
UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-11-2017 19:51, Stephen wrote:
> On 28/11/2017 18:22, omniverse wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate
>>> groups.
>>
>> Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at
>> beginning
>> and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through
>> here. Just
>> hope your not obsessing too much. :)
Obsession? Never! :-)
I probably keep on experimenting until I get bored... or find Nirvana.
;-) Not to be worried though, there are always some elements sticking on
and used elsewhere/when.
>>
>> Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto
>> this
>> would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've
>> seen.
>>
>
> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
>
Hmmm... is that possible? easily? Blobs are not on the list of readily
uv_mapped objects.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>
>> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
>>
>
> Hmmm... is that possible?
After a quick test, yes.
easily?
No. It would need more testing and much more coffee.
I got some results but not something recognisable as the image map.
Blobs are not on the list of readily
> uv_mapped objects.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29-11-2017 9:44, Stephen wrote:
> On 29/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm... is that possible?
>
> After a quick test, yes.
>
> easily?
>
> No. It would need more testing and much more coffee.
> I got some results but not something recognisable as the image map.
>
> Blobs are not on the list of readily
>> uv_mapped objects.
>
>
Hmm... I shall leave that alone for the time being.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/11/2017 12:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 29-11-2017 9:44, Stephen wrote:
>> On 29/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm... is that possible?
>>
>> After a quick test, yes.
>>
>> easily?
>>
>> No. It would need more testing and much more coffee.
>> I got some results but not something recognisable as the image map.
>>
>> Blobs are not on the list of readily
>>> uv_mapped objects.
>>
>>
>
> Hmm... I shall leave that alone for the time being.
>
Probably best
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
