POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Antony Gormley simulation Server Time
17 Jul 2025 13:01:31 EDT (-0400)
  Antony Gormley simulation (Message 39 to 48 of 108)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 27 Nov 2017 11:41:40
Message: <5a1c4044$1@news.povray.org>
On 27/11/2017 16:26, tth wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 09:51 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> So, I abandoned my attempts at being smart and reverted to the basic
>> filling of the container.
>>
>> This time it is blobs that steal the show, with some brushed metal
>> texture. To make it more interesting (reflection wise) I included a hdri
>> map.
>>
> 
>     I like blobs !
> 
Oh! dear. I must get new glasses. I misread that. ;-)


> http://la.buvette.org/POV/brownian-move/mouvement-monoblob.mp4

I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 27 Nov 2017 11:44:02
Message: <5a1c40d2$1@news.povray.org>
On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.

Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses 
after all. ;-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 02:52:34
Message: <5a1d15c2$1@news.povray.org>
On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
> 
> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses 
> after all. ;-)
> 

You seem to have a problem Stephen. First b-l-obs, then that banner... 
hmm?  :-)

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 03:50:21
Message: <5a1d234d$1@news.povray.org>
On 28/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
>> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
>>
>> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses 
>> after all. ;-)
>>
> 
> You seem to have a problem Stephen. 

You've just noticed? ;-)

> First b-l-obs, then that banner... 
> hmm?  :-)
> 


That's dyslexia for you.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 07:19:18
Message: <5a1d5446$1@news.povray.org>
On 28-11-2017 9:50, Stephen wrote:
> On 28/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 27-11-2017 17:44, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 27/11/2017 16:41, Stephen wrote:
>>>> I like that too but it is quite large almost 300 Meg.
>>>
>>> Interesting banner on the front page. Maybe I don't need new glasses 
>>> after all. ;-)
>>>
>>
>> You seem to have a problem Stephen. 
> 
> You've just noticed? ;-)
> 
>> First b-l-obs, then that banner... hmm?  :-)
>>
> 
> 
> That's dyslexia for you.
> 

Nobody is perfect.

[trips over own feet]

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 07:20:47
Message: <5a1d549f@news.povray.org>
A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'antony gormley sim_2_3.png' (442 KB)

Preview of image 'antony gormley sim_2_3.png'
antony gormley sim_2_3.png


 

From: omniverse
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 13:25:01
Message: <web.5a1da9662471086b9c5d6c810@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.

Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at beginning
and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through here. Just
hope your not obsessing too much. :)

Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto this
would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've seen.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 28 Nov 2017 13:51:16
Message: <5a1db024$1@news.povray.org>
On 28/11/2017 18:22, omniverse wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate groups.
> 
> Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at beginning
> and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through here. Just
> hope your not obsessing too much. :)
> 
> Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto this
> would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've seen.
> 

UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 29 Nov 2017 02:52:28
Message: <5a1e673c$1@news.povray.org>
On 28-11-2017 19:51, Stephen wrote:
> On 28/11/2017 18:22, omniverse wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>> A little better, but I need now to divide the container in separate 
>>> groups.
>>
>> Not sure where you're going with this, I liked the metal sculpture at 
>> beginning
>> and these blobs seem to be causing you some trouble as I read through 
>> here. Just
>> hope your not obsessing too much. :)

Obsession? Never! :-)

I probably keep on experimenting until I get bored... or find Nirvana. 
;-) Not to be worried though, there are always some elements sticking on 
and used elsewhere/when.

>>
>> Random thought occurred to me. A projected image of actual person onto 
>> this
>> would be interesting, like those special effect particle people I've 
>> seen.
>>
> 
> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
> 

Hmmm... is that possible? easily? Blobs are not on the list of readily 
uv_mapped objects.

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Antony Gormley simulation
Date: 29 Nov 2017 03:44:05
Message: <5a1e7355$1@news.povray.org>
On 29/11/2017 07:52, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>
>> UV mapping a blob. Now there's a thought. :)
>>
> 
> Hmmm... is that possible? 

After a quick test, yes.

easily?

No. It would need more testing and much more coffee.
I got some results but not something recognisable as the image map.

Blobs are not on the list of readily
> uv_mapped objects.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.