 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote on 03/11/2017 13:38:
> Next version.
>
> - I did not change the Sun elevation. This one shows the nicest
> sunbeams. Higher or lower elevations do not add much to the scene.
>
> - I rotated the house (and attached foreground) in order to better show
> the arc and tower base of the house.
>
> - I added 15000 billboard trees to the landscape, enough to have a
> significant impact on the local CO2 atmospheric content. Tiff billboards
> coming with the Xfrog tree.
>
It's a beautiful render. You can perhaps add a figure with a candle at a
window, in order to increase the tense of awaiting.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/11/2017 09:09, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>>
>
> It's a beautiful render. You can perhaps add a figure with a candle at a
> window, in order to increase the tense of awaiting.
> Paolo
Or to the figure on the balcony. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6-11-2017 11:36, Stephen wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 09:09, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> It's a beautiful render. You can perhaps add a figure with a candle at
>> a window, in order to increase the tense of awaiting.
>> Paolo
>
>
> Or to the figure on the balcony. ;-)
>
Well, of course some life will appear eventually in this scene. ;-) I am
not yet sure in what form. The figure on the balcony is a prop for
getting sizes right during modelling but it can be changed...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/1/2017 4:04 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> [wip]
cool ... i like the camera angle and back lighting. maybe less normal on
the water would give a better look at sky/environment. looking forward
to your progress
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7-11-2017 11:52, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 11/1/2017 4:04 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> [wip]
>
> cool ... i like the camera angle and back lighting. maybe less normal on
> the water would give a better look at sky/environment. looking forward
> to your progress
>
Thanks Jim; yes, that water is looking too troubled indeed. I was
thinking about changing that but another little project took my
attention away (as always).
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 11/3/2017 um 13:38 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> Next version.
>
The sky looks gorgeous and the tree in the foreground adds nicely to the
composition. I love back lit scenes.
My only concern are the water ripples - scaled too big.
-Ive
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote on 06/11/2017 11:36:
> On 06/11/2017 09:09, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> It's a beautiful render. You can perhaps add a figure with a candle at
>> a window, in order to increase the tense of awaiting.
>> Paolo
>
>
> Or to the figure on the balcony. ;-)
>
I like the idea of the light coming from the inside, and now that the
view is rotated there is less evidence of the windows (ok, perhaps in a
inhabited house we have curtains and furnishings and from outside we
cannot see this amount of light).
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-11-2017 10:36, Ive wrote:
> Am 11/3/2017 um 13:38 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> Next version.
>>
> The sky looks gorgeous and the tree in the foreground adds nicely to the
> composition. I love back lit scenes.
> My only concern are the water ripples - scaled too big.
>
Jim also mentioned the water and I agree. It has been on my ToDo list
for a while... ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> On 03/11/2017 16:46, Bald Eagle wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >
> >> - I added 15000 billboard trees to the landscape, enough to have a
> >> significant impact on the local CO2 atmospheric content.
> >
> > Switch it hemp
>
> Now you're talking. ;-)
Off topic? On topic? I can't tell...
Let's call it "on tangent" ;)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/how-much-marijuana-take-to-kill-you-fatal-weed-a8043856.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/11/2017 17:53, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 03/11/2017 16:46, Bald Eagle wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>
>>>> - I added 15000 billboard trees to the landscape, enough to have a
>>>> significant impact on the local CO2 atmospheric content.
>>>
>>> Switch it hemp
>>
>> Now you're talking. ;-)
>
>
> Off topic? On topic? I can't tell...
> Let's call it "on tangent" ;)
>
>
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/how-much-marijuana-take-to-kill-you-fatal-weed-a8043856.html
>
OMG The secret's out. ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
